Smt. Laxmibai W/o. Nagappa Ambiger vs Chinnavva W/o. Kanakappa Ambiger — 226/2022

Case under U Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 Cpc. Status: Hearing on IA. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KABK310014922022

Hearing on IA

Next Hearing

24th April 2026

Filing Number

226/2022

Filing Date

23-03-2022

Registration No

226/2022

Registration Date

23-03-2022

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUNGUND

Judge

116-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNGUND

Acts & Sections

U Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 Cpc

Petitioner(s)

Smt. Laxmibai W/o. Nagappa Ambiger

Adv. M.M.KANDAGAL,

Parashuram S/o. Nagappa Ambiger

Sanjeevappa S/o. Nagappa Ambiger

Yallappa S/o. Nagappa Ambiger

Respondent(s)

Chinnavva W/o. Kanakappa Ambiger

Shekhavva W/o. Laxman Walikar

Mahesh S/o. Kanakappa Ambiger

Laxmi W/o. Dundappa Timmannavar

Hearing History

Judge: 116-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNGUND

06-03-2026

Hearing on IA

07-02-2026

Objection

08-01-2026

ARGUMENTS

09-12-2025

EVIDENCES

28-11-2025

EVIDENCES

Interim Orders

25-09-2023
Deposition
04-12-2023
Issue
11-12-2023
Deposition
11-08-2025
Deposition
24-10-2025
Deposition
08-01-2026
Deposition

Case Summary OS No. 226/2022 - Dated 08-01-2026 The court admitted various documents as evidence, including Original Suit No. 127/90, testimony from witness Gangavva Ambigera (marked as Exhibit-2), village record documents (Exhibit-3), and orders from the District Munsiff's Court in Land Case No. 1394/2019 (Exhibits 4-6). The plaintiff's counsel argued the case on merits, and the court proceeded with examination of the evidence presented by both parties in this civil dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary OS No. 226/2022 - Dated 08-01-2026 The court admitted various documents as evidence, including Original Suit No. 127/90, testimony from witness Gangavva Ambigera (marked as Exhibit-2), village record documents (Exhibit-3), and orders from the District Munsiff's Court in Land Case No. 1394/2019 (Exhibits 4-6). The plaintiff's counsel argued the case on merits, and the court proceeded with examination of the evidence presented by both parties in this civil dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUNGUND All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case