Kumari Reshma D/o. Kenchappa Pujari vs Sangappa S/o. Basappa Hoolageri — 554/2022
Case under U Sec 166 of M V Act 1998. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KABK300005972022
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
554/2022
Filing Date
28-12-2022
Registration No
554/2022
Registration Date
29-12-2022
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNGUND
Judge
1024-SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNGUND
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kumari Reshma D/o. Kenchappa Pujari
Adv. R.B. BADAWADAGI
Kumari Neelamma D/o Kenchappa Pujari
Adv. R.B. BADAWADAGI
Kumar Sangappa S/o. Kenchappa Pujari
Adv. R.B. BADAWADAGI
Kenchappa M/o. Balawwa Pujari
Adv. R.B. BADAWADAGI
Respondent(s)
Sangappa S/o. Basappa Hoolageri
The Manager IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance company Ltd.
Hearing History
Judge: 1024-SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNGUND
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 30-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 26-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed the petitioners' application to condone a delay of 1550 days in preferring the petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court found sufficient cause for the delay, considering the petitioners' loss of a family member in an accident and subsequent mental agony, coupled with the investigating officer's own delay in filing the charge sheet. The court imposed costs of Rs. 4,000/- and proceeded to hear the main petition on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed the petitioners' application to condone a delay of 1550 days in preferring the petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court found sufficient cause for the delay, considering the petitioners' loss of a family member in an accident and subsequent mental agony, coupled with the investigating officer's own delay in filing the charge sheet. The court imposed costs of Rs. 4,000/- and proceeded to hear the main petition on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts