Smt. Yankavva W/o. Yamanappa Walikar vs Santosh S/o. Shekharagouda Policepatil — 369/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s. 166 of M.V. Act. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KABK300004822024
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
369/2024
Filing Date
26-07-2024
Registration No
369/2024
Registration Date
26-07-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNGUND
Judge
1024-SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNGUND
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Yankavva W/o. Yamanappa Walikar
Adv. M.L.SHANTAGIRI
Yamanappa S/o. Sangappa Walikar
Respondent(s)
Santosh S/o. Shekharagouda Policepatil
Rahul B Rai
The Branch Manager Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.,
Hearing History
Judge: 1024-SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNGUND
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 23-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: MVC 369/2024 Outcome: The court ordered that the 3rd accused be required to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 and an additional surety of Rs. 20,000 to secure his presence before the court. The accused's statement regarding the 2nd accused was found insufficient and the petition was rejected accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: MVC 369/2024 Outcome: The court ordered that the 3rd accused be required to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 and an additional surety of Rs. 20,000 to secure his presence before the court. The accused's statement regarding the 2nd accused was found insufficient and the petition was rejected accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts