Rajesab S/o Husenasab Guledagudda vs Satish S/o Sadananda Parab — 272/2022
Case under U Sec 166 of M V Act 1998. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KABK300003742022
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
272/2022
Filing Date
27-07-2022
Registration No
272/2022
Registration Date
27-07-2022
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNGUND
Judge
1024-SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNGUND
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajesab S/o Husenasab Guledagudda
Adv. Timmanna M Chalawadi
Respondent(s)
Satish S/o Sadananda Parab
The Branch Manager ICICI General Unsurance Co Ltd
Hearing History
Judge: 1024-SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNGUND
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 26-12-2025 | OBJECTION |
| 21-11-2025 | OBJECTION |
Interim Orders
This is a Motor Vehicle Accident Case (MVC 272/22) from a Kannada-language court order. The document contains witness testimony regarding an accident that occurred on 28-09-2021, with proceedings dated 15-07-2023 and 05-04-2024. The court examined medical records, case sheets, discharge cards, and injury documentation. No specific final order granting/denying bail, dismissing/allowing the petition, or adjourning the case is clearly stated in the legible portions provided. The document primarily records witness statements and evidence review rather than a conclusive ruling. Summary: The court heard testimony and reviewed medical evidence in MVC 272/22 relating to an accident injury claim; no final adjudication is evident from the legible text. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Motor Vehicle Accident Case (MVC 272/22) from a Kannada-language court order. The document contains witness testimony regarding an accident that occurred on 28-09-2021, with proceedings dated 15-07-2023 and 05-04-2024. The court examined medical records, case sheets, discharge cards, and injury documentation. No specific final order granting/denying bail, dismissing/allowing the petition, or adjourning the case is clearly stated in the legible portions provided. The document primarily records witness statements and evidence review rather than a conclusive ruling. Summary: The court heard testimony and reviewed medical evidence in MVC 272/22 relating to an accident injury claim; no final adjudication is evident from the legible text. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts