Smt. Rudramma W/o. Kalakappa Kalalabandi vs Smt. Rachavva W/o. Huchchappa Tatrani — 112/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o,7Rule1&2,ofCPC. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABK300002792024
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
Filing Number
112/2024
Filing Date
26-04-2024
Registration No
112/2024
Registration Date
26-04-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNGUND
Judge
1024-SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNGUND
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Rudramma W/o. Kalakappa Kalalabandi
Adv. N.J. Ramawadagi
Respondent(s)
Smt. Rachavva W/o. Huchchappa Tatrani
Shekharappa S/o. Huchchappa Tatrani
Shiddappa S/o.Huchchappa Tatrani
Shivaputrappa S/o. Huchchappa Tatrani
Narayana S/o. Shiddappa Tatrani
Hearing History
Judge: 1024-SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNGUND
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
ISSUES
FURNISH AMENDED PLAINT/PETITION
FURNISH AMENDED PLAINT/PETITION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 27-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 16-02-2026 | ISSUES |
| 29-01-2026 | FURNISH AMENDED PLAINT/PETITION |
| 28-01-2026 | FURNISH AMENDED PLAINT/PETITION |
Interim Orders
The court order in OS. 112/2024 is dated 06-03-2026. The document directs that the case be adjourned to the next hearing date, with both parties required to present their arguments and evidence as per the court's procedural directions. The court also notes that the parties should comply with the filing requirements and appear on the scheduled date for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court order in OS. 112/2024 is dated 06-03-2026. The document directs that the case be adjourned to the next hearing date, with both parties required to present their arguments and evidence as per the court's procedural directions. The court also notes that the parties should comply with the filing requirements and appear on the scheduled date for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts