Bhimanagouda S/o Hanamagouda Patil @ Goudar vs Gajanand S/o. Kallayya Math @ Hiremath — 375/2020
Case under U Sec 166 of M V Act 1998. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KABK300002712020
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
375/2020
Filing Date
20-10-2020
Registration No
375/2020
Registration Date
20-10-2020
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNGUND
Judge
1024-SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNGUND
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhimanagouda S/o Hanamagouda Patil @ Goudar
Adv. M.B.AMATIGOUDAR
Hanamagouda S/o Bhimanagouda Patil @ Goudar
Adv. M.B.AMATIGOUDAR
Muttappa S/o Bhimanagouda Patil @ Goudar
Adv. M.B.AMATIGOUDAR
Smt.Yallavva W/o. Muniyappa Mahagundappanavar
Adv. M.B.AMATIGOUDAR
Smt. Mahantavva W/o Yallappa Gatti
Adv. M.B.AMATIGOUDAR
Respondent(s)
Gajanand S/o. Kallayya Math @ Hiremath
Chandrashekar S/o. Virabasappa Shettar
Hanamanth S/o. Bhimappa Goudar
The Branch Manager Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd
Hearing History
Judge: 1024-SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNGUND
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 13-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 30-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 09-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 19-12-2025 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: MVC 375/2020, RW-1 Date: 19-12-2025 The court examined a motor vehicle accident case and found that the injured party suffered injuries within a 22 km radius of the accident location. The court determined that the accident occurred due to the negligence of the vehicle driver under Section 29(a) of the IPC read with Section 5377 (relevant statute). The court confirmed that the injured party is entitled to compensation and directed that the matter proceed accordingly, with all relevant evidence and police investigation reports to be considered in determining the appropriate quantum of damages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: MVC 375/2020, RW-1 Date: 19-12-2025 The court examined a motor vehicle accident case and found that the injured party suffered injuries within a 22 km radius of the accident location. The court determined that the accident occurred due to the negligence of the vehicle driver under Section 29(a) of the IPC read with Section 5377 (relevant statute). The court confirmed that the injured party is entitled to compensation and directed that the matter proceed accordingly, with all relevant evidence and police investigation reports to be considered in determining the appropriate quantum of damages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts