BHIMARAO S/O HANAMANTRAO KULAKARNI vs SHRINIVAS S/O NARAYANRAO KULKANRNI — 167/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER7RULE1AND2. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABK300002512026
e-Filing Number
03-03-2026
Filing Number
167/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
167/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNGUND
Judge
1024-Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 20-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHIMARAO S/O HANAMANTRAO KULAKARNI
Adv. para desai
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHRINIVAS S/O NARAYANRAO KULKANRNI
-
2.SUNANDA K SHELAVADI
-
3.VASANTRAO S/O NARAYANRAO KULKARNI
-
4.KULKARNI B N URF BINDUMADHAV
-
5.SMT. GITABAI W/O VASANTARAO KULKARNI
-
6.DR PRALHADRAO S/O NARAYANRAO KULKARNI
-
7.RUKMINIBAI W/O RATNAKAR KULKARNI
-
8.NAGARATNA W/O VEERABHDRAPPA KOLLI
-
9.PRAMILABAI W/o RAMARAO N
-
10.VEENA W/O GURURAJ MUTALIK
-
11.SRI RANGARAO S/O HANAMANTARAO KULKARNI
-
12.GOVINDARAO S/O HANAMANTARAO KULKARNI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The court approved a joint compromise petition filed by the plaintiff and defendants under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC, after verifying that both parties voluntarily settled their dispute to end litigation and preserve their relationship. The plaintiff's suit was decreed in terms of the compromise agreement, which was found lawful and incorporated into the final decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
12-Mar-2026
Adr
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 167/2026
The court approved a joint compromise petition filed by the plaintiff and defendants under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC, after verifying that both parties voluntarily settled their dispute to end litigation and preserve their relationship. The plaintiff's suit was decreed in terms of the compromise agreement, which was found lawful and incorporated into the final decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts