Smt Sudha W/o Gaviyappa Kathani vs Smt Rekha W/o Sangappa Kathani — 165/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORDER7RULE1AND2. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABK300002472026
e-Filing Number
03-03-2026
Filing Number
165/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
165/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNGUND
Judge
1024-SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNGUND
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt Sudha W/o Gaviyappa Kathani
Adv. Manjunath Shivanand Annanavar
Kumari Rajeshwari d/o Gaviyappa Kathani Repted MGM by Plaintiff No.1.
Adv. Manjunath Shivanand Annanavar
Kumari Shreya d/o Gaviyappa Kathani Repted MGM by Plaintiff No.1.
Adv. Manjunath Shivanand Annanavar
Kumari Sanvi D/o Gaviyappa Kathani Repted MGM by Plaintiff No.1.
Adv. Manjunath Shivanand Annanavar
Kumari Shivagangamma D/o Gaviyappa Kathani Repted MGM by Plaintiff No.1
Adv. Manjunath Shivanand Annanavar
Respondent(s)
Smt Rekha W/o Sangappa Kathani
Smt Akshata W/o Sampatkumar Katagi
Smt Ashwini W/o Swaraj Muranal
Kumari Vijayalakshmi D/o Sangappa Kathani
Kumar Basavaraj S/o Sangappa Kathani Repted MGM by Defendant No.1
Kumar Naveenakumar S/o Sangappa Kathani Repted MGM by Defendant No.1
Hearing History
Judge: 1024-SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNGUND
Disposed
ADR
A.D.R.
A.D.R.
A.D.R.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | ADR |
| 12-03-2026 | A.D.R. |
| 11-03-2026 | A.D.R. |
| 06-03-2026 | A.D.R. |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the joint compromise petition filed by both parties under Order 23, Rule 3 of CPC and decreed the plaintiff's suit in terms of the compromise agreement. The court verified that both parties voluntarily settled their dispute to end litigation and preserve their relationship, and found the compromise terms lawful and acceptable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the joint compromise petition filed by both parties under Order 23, Rule 3 of CPC and decreed the plaintiff's suit in terms of the compromise agreement. The court verified that both parties voluntarily settled their dispute to end litigation and preserve their relationship, and found the compromise terms lawful and acceptable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts