Smt.Sumangala W/o Sangayya Vastrad vs Sri.Mahantayya S/o Basayya Topagi @ Hiremath @ Math Advocate - V.B. Deshapande — 9/2019
Case under U/o.20 Rule 18 of Cpc. Status: FURNISH AMENDED PLAINT/PETITION. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr
CNR: KABK300000852019
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
Filing Number
9/2019
Filing Date
11-03-2019
Registration No
9/2019
Registration Date
11-03-2019
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNGUND
Judge
1024-SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNGUND
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt.Sumangala W/o Sangayya Vastrad
Adv. P.B. Hulyal
Sri.Sharanayya S/o Basayya Topagi @ Hiremath @ Math
Adv. P.B. Hulyal
Sri.Irayya S/o Basayya Topagi @ Hiremath @ Math
Adv. P.B. Hulyal
Sri.Shidramayya S/o Siddayya Topagi @ Hiremath @ Math
Adv. P.B. Hulyal
Respondent(s)
Sri.Mahantayya S/o Basayya Topagi @ Hiremath @ Math Advocate - V.B. Deshapande
Smt.Iramma W/o Siddalingayya Topagi @ Hiremath
Sri.Siddayya S/o Siddalingayya Topagi @ Hiremath
Smt.Annakka W/o Shantayya Boosanooramath
Smt.Basamma W/o Sharanayya Yavagallamath
Smt.Mahadevi W/o Rachayya Hiremath
Smt.Paramma W/o Nagayya Hiremath
Sri.Karibasayya S/o Siddayya Topagi @ Hiremath
Smt.Neelavva W/o Shivarudrayya Golasangi
Adv. M.S. Bijakall
Smt.Suvarna @ Neelamma w/o Channabasayya Gudadooramath
Adv. P.B. Hulyal
Hearing History
Judge: 1024-SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HUNGUND
FURNISH AMENDED PLAINT/PETITION
ORDER
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | FURNISH AMENDED PLAINT/PETITION |
| 09-02-2026 | ORDER |
| 12-01-2026 | ORDER |
| 15-12-2025 | HEARING |
| 05-11-2025 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed the interlocutory application (I.A. No. III) filed under Section 151 of the CPC to modify the preliminary decree in O.S. No. 44/2017. The modification was granted to reflect the change in law following the Supreme Court's Vinuta Sharma judgment, which grants daughters equal coparcenary rights with sons in Hindu succession. The court redetermined the property shares among the plaintiffs and defendants in the suit schedule properties accordingly, with the office directed to draw a fresh preliminary decree reflecting these new share allocations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed the interlocutory application (I.A. No. III) filed under Section 151 of the CPC to modify the preliminary decree in O.S. No. 44/2017. The modification was granted to reflect the change in law following the Supreme Court's Vinuta Sharma judgment, which grants daughters equal coparcenary rights with sons in Hindu succession. The court redetermined the property shares among the plaintiffs and defendants in the suit schedule properties accordingly, with the office directed to draw a fresh preliminary decree reflecting these new share allocations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts