Masanappa S/o. Chandappa Walikar @ Olekar vs Premanath S/o. Kasaghappa Chikkatumbal — 49/2023
Case under U Sec 166 of M V Act. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KABK300000792023
Filing Number
49/2023
Filing Date
02-Feb-2023
Registration No
49/2023
Registration Date
04-Feb-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNGUND
Judge
1024-Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
Last updated 20-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Masanappa S/o. Chandappa Walikar @ Olekar
Adv. B.A.AWATI,
Respondent(s)
-
1.Premanath S/o. Kasaghappa Chikkatumbal
-
2.The Branch Manager National insurance Co ltd
Adv. MAHANTESH H.HOSUR
Case History
-
10-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary The court allowed I.A. No. VI and condoned the 65-day delay in filing Motor Accident Claim Petition MVC 49/2023 (accident on 29/05/2022, petition filed 02/02/2023), finding the petitioner's injuries and hospitalization constituted sufficient cause under the Limitation Act. Costs of Rs. 1,000 were imposed. Consequently, the court rejected I.A. No. V (respondent's application to dismiss as time-barred) as it no longer survived consideration after delay condonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
13-Feb-2026
Orders
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
23-Jan-2026
Objection
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
26-Dec-2025
Evidence
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
07-Nov-2025
Commissioner Warrant
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
10-Oct-2025
Commissioner Warrant
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
01-Aug-2025
Commissioner Warrant
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
11-Jul-2025
Commissioner Warrant
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
13-Jun-2025
Commissioner Warrant
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
25-Apr-2025
Objection
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
21-Mar-2025
Objection
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
07-Mar-2025
Objection
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
14-Feb-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
14-Feb-2025
Evidence
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
07-Feb-2025
Evidence
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
24-Jan-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
24-Jan-2025
Evidence
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
10-Jan-2025
Evidence
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
14-Dec-2024
Evidence
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
15-Nov-2024
Adr
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
27-Sep-2024
Evidence
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
14-Sep-2024
Evidence
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
23-Aug-2024
Adr
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
09-Aug-2024
Evidence
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
13-Jul-2024
Evidence
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
05-Jul-2024
Adr
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
21-Jun-2024
Evidence
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
14-Jun-2024
Evidence
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
26-Apr-2024
Evidence
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
16-Mar-2024
Evidence
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
09-Mar-2024
Adr
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
02-Feb-2024
Adr
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
09-Dec-2023
Evidence
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
08-Nov-2023
IssueView PDF
-
08-Nov-2023
Adr
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
02-Nov-2023
Objection
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
11-Oct-2023
Issues
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
09-Sep-2023
Issues
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
23-Aug-2023
Adr
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
02-Aug-2023
Written Statement
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
19-Jul-2023
Written Statement
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
28-Jun-2023
Written Statement
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
12-Jun-2023
Written Statement
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
10-Apr-2023
Written Statement
Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund
-
14-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Feb-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 49/2023
Summary The court allowed I.A. No. VI and condoned the 65-day delay in filing Motor Accident Claim Petition MVC 49/2023 (accident on 29/05/2022, petition filed 02/02/2023), finding the petitioner's injuries and hospitalization constituted sufficient cause under the Limitation Act. Costs of Rs. 1,000 were imposed. Consequently, the court rejected I.A. No. V (respondent's application to dismiss as time-barred) as it no longer survived consideration after delay condonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts