Bismilla W/o Shahed Roje vs S.P.R Traansport its proprietor Sayyed Husen Peera Khadri Advocate - N.L. Tahasildar — 48/2023

Case under U Sec 166 of M V Act. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KABK300000782023

Filing Number

48/2023

Filing Date

02-Feb-2023

Registration No

48/2023

Registration Date

04-Feb-2023

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNGUND

Judge

1024-Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

Last updated 20-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

U Sec 166 of M V Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bismilla W/o Shahed Roje

    Adv. B.A.AWATI,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S.P.R Traansport its proprietor Sayyed Husen Peera Khadri Advocate - N.L. Tahasildar

  2. 2.The Regional ManagerNew Indiaa Assurance Co. Ltd.

    Adv. MAHANTESH H.HOSUR

  3. 3.Ganesh S/o Tavarappa Chavan @ Lamani

    Adv. N.L. Tahasildar

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary The court allowed the petitioner's application (I.A. No. X) to condone a 60-day delay in filing a motor accident claim petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, imposing costs of Rs. 1,000. The court found sufficient cause for the delay, as the petitioner had sustained injuries from the accident and was unable to walk, citing Supreme Court precedent that delays should be liberally construed when there is merit in the case. Subsequently, the court rejected respondent's application (I.A. No. IX) seeking dismissal on limitation grounds, as it became moot following the condonation of delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  5. 23-Jan-2026

    Objection

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  6. 26-Dec-2025

    Objection

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  7. 05-Dec-2025

    Objection

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  8. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  9. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  10. 07-Nov-2025

    Commissioner Warrant

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  11. 10-Oct-2025

    Commissioner Warrant

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  12. 01-Aug-2025

    Commissioner Warrant

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  13. 27-Jun-2025

    Commissioner Warrant

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  14. 09-May-2025

    Summons

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  15. 11-Apr-2025

    Commissioner Warrant

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  16. 28-Mar-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  17. 28-Mar-2025

    Objection

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  18. 21-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  19. 01-Mar-2025

    IssueView PDF

  20. 01-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  21. 28-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  22. 14-Feb-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  23. 14-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  24. 07-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  25. 24-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  26. 10-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  27. 13-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  28. 06-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  29. 08-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  30. 20-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  31. 23-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  32. 09-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  33. 13-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  34. 05-Jul-2024

    Adr

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  35. 21-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  36. 14-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  37. 26-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  38. 16-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  39. 09-Mar-2024

    Adr

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  40. 02-Feb-2024

    Adr

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  41. 09-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  42. 09-Nov-2023

    IssueView PDF

  43. 09-Nov-2023

    Adr

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  44. 11-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  45. 27-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  46. 13-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  47. 09-Aug-2023

    Written Statement

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  48. 15-Jul-2023

    Written Statement

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  49. 12-Jun-2023

    Written StatementView PDF

  50. 12-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  51. 10-Apr-2023

    Written Statement

    Sr.civil Judge And JMFC Hungund

  52. 14-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  53. 02-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 48/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed the petitioner's application (I.A. No. X) to condone a 60-day delay in filing a motor accident claim petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, imposing costs of Rs. 1,000. The court found sufficient cause for the delay, as the petitioner had sustained injuries from the accident and was unable to walk, citing Supreme Court precedent that delays should be liberally construed when there is merit in the case. Subsequently, the court rejected respondent's application (I.A. No. IX) seeking dismissal on limitation grounds, as it became moot following the condonation of delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case