Mahalingesh Bharamappa Dodamani vs Smt Laxmi Mahalingeswar Dodamani — 10022/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,BNSS. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 06th March 2026.
CRL.R.P. - CRIMINAL REVISION PETITIONS
CNR: KABK220002282025
e-Filing Number
27-06-2025
Filing Number
10022/2025
Filing Date
28-06-2025
Registration No
10022/2025
Registration Date
28-06-2025
Court
III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,BAGALKOT TO SIT AT MUDHOL
Judge
1565-III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT TO SIT AT MUDHOL
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahalingesh Bharamappa Dodamani
Adv. Giriyappa Shivalingappa Patil
Respondent(s)
Smt Laxmi Mahalingeswar Dodamani
Kum Krishna Mahalingeshwar Dodamani R by M/G natural mother Respondent No.1
Hearing History
Judge: 1565-III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT TO SIT AT MUDHOL
Disposed
ORDERS
ORDERS
TCR
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-02-2026 | ORDERS |
| 07-02-2026 | ORDERS |
| 02-02-2026 | TCR |
| 17-01-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court allowed the revision petition and set aside the trial court's maintenance order dated 05.11.2024, which had directed the husband to pay Rs. 4,000/- monthly to his wife and child. However, recognizing the wife's lack of means and the child's minor status, the court directed the husband to continue paying the interim maintenance until the trial court redisposes the case after ensuring both parties comply with Supreme Court guidelines from *Rajanesh v. Neha* requiring disclosure of assets and liabilities affidavits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The court allowed the revision petition and set aside the trial court's maintenance order dated 05.11.2024, which had directed the husband to pay Rs. 4,000/- monthly to his wife and child. However, recognizing the wife's lack of means and the child's minor status, the court directed the husband to continue paying the interim maintenance until the trial court redisposes the case after ensuring both parties comply with Supreme Court guidelines from *Rajanesh v. Neha* requiring disclosure of assets and liabilities affidavits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts