Appannagouda S/o Bhimanagouda Patil vs Ramanagouda S/o Basanagouda Patil — 10030/2025
Case under U Sec 96 R/w Order 41 Rule , 1 Cpc. Status: ARGUMENTES. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
R.A. - Regular Appeals
CNR: KABK220001442025
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
e-Filing Number
21-08-2024
Filing Number
10030/2025
Filing Date
11-09-2024
Registration No
10030/2025
Registration Date
11-09-2024
Court
III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,BAGALKOT TO SIT AT MUDHOL
Judge
1565-III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT TO SIT AT MUDHOL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Appannagouda S/o Bhimanagouda Patil
Adv. J B Nigade
Respondent(s)
Ramanagouda S/o Basanagouda Patil
Basanagouda S/o Ramanagouda Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1565-III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT TO SIT AT MUDHOL
ARGUMENTES
ARGUMENTES
ARGUMENTES
Cross of DW/PW
Cross of DW/PW
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | ARGUMENTES |
| 13-03-2026 | ARGUMENTES |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTES |
| 21-02-2026 | Cross of DW/PW |
| 17-02-2026 | Cross of DW/PW |
Interim Orders
In case R.A. No. 10030/2025 before the 3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bagalkot, the court adjourned the case to 12.01.2026 for witness examination. The court rejected three documents submitted by the petitioner's counsel as they lacked proper digital signature verification or barcode and did not comply with Section 63(1) of the Indian Evidence Act. The respondent's counsel stated there was insufficient evidence, and the matter was adjourned as requested by the respondent's advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In case R.A. No. 10030/2025 before the 3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bagalkot, the court adjourned the case to 12.01.2026 for witness examination. The court rejected three documents submitted by the petitioner's counsel as they lacked proper digital signature verification or barcode and did not comply with Section 63(1) of the Indian Evidence Act. The respondent's counsel stated there was insufficient evidence, and the matter was adjourned as requested by the respondent's advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts