Appannagouda S/o Bhimanagouda Patil vs Ramanagouda S/o Basanagouda Patil — 10030/2025

Case under U Sec 96 R/w Order 41 Rule , 1 Cpc. Status: ARGUMENTES. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.

R.A. - Regular Appeals

CNR: KABK220001442025

ARGUMENTES

Next Hearing

23rd March 2026

e-Filing Number

21-08-2024

Filing Number

10030/2025

Filing Date

11-09-2024

Registration No

10030/2025

Registration Date

11-09-2024

Court

III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,BAGALKOT TO SIT AT MUDHOL

Judge

1565-III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT TO SIT AT MUDHOL

Acts & Sections

U Sec 96 R/w Order 41 Rule , 1 Cpc

Petitioner(s)

Appannagouda S/o Bhimanagouda Patil

Adv. J B Nigade

Respondent(s)

Ramanagouda S/o Basanagouda Patil

Basanagouda S/o Ramanagouda Patil

Hearing History

Judge: 1565-III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT TO SIT AT MUDHOL

17-03-2026

ARGUMENTES

13-03-2026

ARGUMENTES

06-03-2026

ARGUMENTES

21-02-2026

Cross of DW/PW

17-02-2026

Cross of DW/PW

Interim Orders

12-01-2026
Deposition

In case R.A. No. 10030/2025 before the 3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bagalkot, the court adjourned the case to 12.01.2026 for witness examination. The court rejected three documents submitted by the petitioner's counsel as they lacked proper digital signature verification or barcode and did not comply with Section 63(1) of the Indian Evidence Act. The respondent's counsel stated there was insufficient evidence, and the matter was adjourned as requested by the respondent's advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In case R.A. No. 10030/2025 before the 3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bagalkot, the court adjourned the case to 12.01.2026 for witness examination. The court rejected three documents submitted by the petitioner's counsel as they lacked proper digital signature verification or barcode and did not comply with Section 63(1) of the Indian Evidence Act. The respondent's counsel stated there was insufficient evidence, and the matter was adjourned as requested by the respondent's advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,BAGALKOT TO SIT AT MUDHOL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case