Appannagouda S/o Bhimanagouda Patil vs Ramanagouda S/o Basanagouda Patil — 10030/2025
Case under U Sec 96 R/w Order 41 Rule , 1 Cpc. Status: Argumentes. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
R.A. - Regular Appeals
CNR: KABK220001442025
e-Filing Number
21-08-2024
Filing Number
10030/2025
Filing Date
11-Sep-2024
Registration No
10030/2025
Registration Date
11-Sep-2024
Court
III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,BAGALKOT TO SIT AT MUDHOL
Judge
1565-III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
Last updated 20-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Appannagouda S/o Bhimanagouda Patil
Adv. J B Nigade
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ramanagouda S/o Basanagouda Patil
-
2.Basanagouda S/o Ramanagouda Patil
Case History
-
23-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Mar-2026
Argumentes
III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
-
13-Mar-2026
Argumentes
III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
-
06-Mar-2026
Argumentes
III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
-
21-Feb-2026
Cross of Dw/Pw
III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
-
17-Feb-2026
Cross of Dw/Pw
III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
-
12-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
In case R.A. No. 10030/2025 before the 3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bagalkot, the court adjourned the case to 12.01.2026 for witness examination. The court rejected three documents submitted by the petitioner's counsel as they lacked proper digital signature verification or barcode and did not comply with Section 63(1) of the Indian Evidence Act. The respondent's counsel stated there was insufficient evidence, and the matter was adjourned as requested by the respondent's advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jan-2026
Cross of Dw/Pw
III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
-
07-Jan-2026
Further Evidence
III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
-
06-Jan-2026
Arguments
III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
-
10-Dec-2025
Arguments
III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
-
08-Dec-2025
Arguments
III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
-
02-Dec-2025
Arguments
III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
-
05-Nov-2025
Notice
III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
-
29-Oct-2025
Appearance Of Party
III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
-
15-Oct-2025
Hearing
III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
-
22-Sep-2025
Hearing
III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
-
15-Sep-2025
Hearing
III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
-
10-Sep-2025
Hearing
III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
-
03-Sep-2025
Hearing
III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
-
28-Aug-2025
Hearing
III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
-
21-Aug-2025
Objections
III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
-
11-Aug-2025
Evidence
III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
-
02-Aug-2025
Evidence
III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
-
23-Jul-2025
Tcr
III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
-
07-Jul-2025
Tcr
III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol
-
23-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 10030/2025
In case R.A. No. 10030/2025 before the 3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bagalkot, the court adjourned the case to 12.01.2026 for witness examination. The court rejected three documents submitted by the petitioner's counsel as they lacked proper digital signature verification or barcode and did not comply with Section 63(1) of the Indian Evidence Act. The respondent's counsel stated there was insufficient evidence, and the matter was adjourned as requested by the respondent's advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts