Ramesh Rangappa Singaraddi vs The State of Karnataka Through Lokapur PS, Represented by Public Prosecutor Mudhol — 10012/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec 482 of BNSS-2023. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KABK220001302026
e-Filing Number
24-02-2026
Filing Number
10012/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
10012/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,BAGALKOT TO SIT AT MUDHOL
Judge
1565-III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT TO SIT AT MUDHOL
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramesh Rangappa Singaraddi
Adv. SUHAS P VASTRAD
Smt Savita Ramesh Singaraddi
Adv. SUHAS P VASTRAD
Krishtappa urf Kristanappa s/o Rangappa Singaraddi
Adv. SUHAS P VASTRAD
Sunil s/o Krishtappa Singaraddi
Adv. SUHAS P VASTRAD
Govindappa s/o Bhimappa Singaraddi
Adv. SUHAS P VASTRAD
Basavaraj s/o Govindappa Singaraddi
Adv. SUHAS P VASTRAD
Naveen s/o Timmappa Singaraddi
Adv. SUHAS P VASTRAD
Respondent(s)
The State of Karnataka Through Lokapur PS (Police Station), Represented by Public Prosecutor Mudhol
Hearing History
Judge: 1565-III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT TO SIT AT MUDHOL
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 05-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted anticipatory bail to three of seven accused (petitioners No. 2, 3, and 5)—all senior citizens over 60 years old—in a property dispute case involving assault allegations, while rejecting bail for the younger accused. The court reasoned that the senior citizens posed minimal flight risk or danger of reoffending, but the younger accused's serious alleged overt acts and age raised concerns about potential witness tampering and obstruction of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted anticipatory bail to three of seven accused (petitioners No. 2, 3, and 5)—all senior citizens over 60 years old—in a property dispute case involving assault allegations, while rejecting bail for the younger accused. The court reasoned that the senior citizens posed minimal flight risk or danger of reoffending, but the younger accused's serious alleged overt acts and age raised concerns about potential witness tampering and obstruction of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts