Ramesh Rangappa Singaraddi vs The State of Karnataka Through Lokapur PS, Represented by Public Prosecutor Mudhol — 10012/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec 482 of BNSS-2023. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KABK220001302026

e-Filing Number

24-02-2026

Filing Number

10012/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

10012/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,BAGALKOT TO SIT AT MUDHOL

Judge

1565-III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 20-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec 482 of BNSS-2023

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramesh Rangappa Singaraddi

    Adv. SUHAS P VASTRAD

  2. 2.Smt Savita Ramesh Singaraddi

    Adv. SUHAS P VASTRAD

  3. 3.Krishtappa urf Kristanappa s/o Rangappa Singaraddi

    Adv. SUHAS P VASTRAD

  4. 4.Sunil s/o Krishtappa Singaraddi

    Adv. SUHAS P VASTRAD

  5. 5.Govindappa s/o Bhimappa Singaraddi

    Adv. SUHAS P VASTRAD

  6. 6.Basavaraj s/o Govindappa Singaraddi

    Adv. SUHAS P VASTRAD

  7. 7.Naveen s/o Timmappa Singaraddi

    Adv. SUHAS P VASTRAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Karnataka Through Lokapur PS (Police Station), Represented by Public Prosecutor Mudhol

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court granted anticipatory bail to three of seven accused (petitioners No. 2, 3, and 5)—all senior citizens over 60 years old—in a property dispute case involving assault allegations, while rejecting bail for the younger accused. The court reasoned that the senior citizens posed minimal flight risk or danger of reoffending, but the younger accused's serious alleged overt acts and age raised concerns about potential witness tampering and obstruction of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Objections

    III Additional District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot To Sit At Mudhol

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10012/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted anticipatory bail to three of seven accused (petitioners No. 2, 3, and 5)—all senior citizens over 60 years old—in a property dispute case involving assault allegations, while rejecting bail for the younger accused. The court reasoned that the senior citizens posed minimal flight risk or danger of reoffending, but the younger accused's serious alleged overt acts and age raised concerns about potential witness tampering and obstruction of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case