Siddappa Mahadev Dharigouda vs The State of Karnataka R/by Public Prosecutor Mudhol Police Station — 10010/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/Sec 482of BNSS. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 07th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KABK220000922026
e-Filing Number
16-02-2026
Filing Number
10010/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
10010/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Court
III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,BAGALKOT TO SIT AT MUDHOL
Judge
1565-III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT TO SIT AT MUDHOL
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Siddappa Mahadev Dharigouda
Adv. K S Bilagi
Shrishail Mahadev Dharigouda
Adv. K S Bilagi
Ishwar Mahadev Dharigouda
Adv. K S Bilagi
Respondent(s)
The State of Karnataka R/by Public Prosecutor Mudhol Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 1565-III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT TO SIT AT MUDHOL
Disposed
ORDER
HEARING
OBJECTIONS
OBJECTIONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 05-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 02-03-2026 | OBJECTIONS |
| 26-02-2026 | OBJECTIONS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The III Additional District & Sessions Judge, Bagalkote, granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners accused of assault, wrongful restraint, and criminal intimidation arising from a land dispute. The court found the incident appeared to be a trivial matter blown out of proportion, with no serious offenses warranting denial of bail, and noted the petitioners are local residents with fixed properties and low flight risk. Bail was approved on personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 each with conditions including surrender within 15 days, weekly reporting, non-interference with witnesses, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The III Additional District & Sessions Judge, Bagalkote, granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners accused of assault, wrongful restraint, and criminal intimidation arising from a land dispute. The court found the incident appeared to be a trivial matter blown out of proportion, with no serious offenses warranting denial of bail, and noted the petitioners are local residents with fixed properties and low flight risk. Bail was approved on personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 each with conditions including surrender within 15 days, weekly reporting, non-interference with witnesses, and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts