Ms Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co Ltd Rep by Murtujkhadri Abdulnabi Bilagi vs Bhimappa Basappa Hanchinal — 10012/2026

Case under U Order 21 Rule 11 of Cpc. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

EX - Execution Petition Under Order

CNR: KABK220000762026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

24-01-2026

Filing Number

10012/2026

Filing Date

06-02-2026

Registration No

10012/2026

Registration Date

06-02-2026

Court

III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,BAGALKOT TO SIT AT MUDHOL

Judge

1565-III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT TO SIT AT MUDHOL

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Acts & Sections

U Order 21 Rule 11 of Cpc

Petitioner(s)

Ms Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co Ltd Rep by Murtujkhadri Abdulnabi Bilagi

Adv. NADUVINAMANI HANAMANT

Respondent(s)

Bhimappa Basappa Hanchinal

Hearing History

Judge: 1565-III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT TO SIT AT MUDHOL

14-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

NOTICE

10-02-2026

NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Orders

Summary The Lok Adalath approved a compromise settlement between the decree holder (Dhr Murtujkhadri Bilagi) and judgment debtors (Bhimappa and Savitri), whereby the debtors agreed to pay Rs. 60,000 within 4 months, with partial payment on 16.03.2026. The court found the settlement lawful and without coercion, and closed the execution petition with liberty for the decree holder to file a fresh petition if the balance remains unpaid, subject to limitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Lok Adalath approved a compromise settlement between the decree holder (Dhr Murtujkhadri Bilagi) and judgment debtors (Bhimappa and Savitri), whereby the debtors agreed to pay Rs. 60,000 within 4 months, with partial payment on 16.03.2026. The court found the settlement lawful and without coercion, and closed the execution petition with liberty for the decree holder to file a fresh petition if the balance remains unpaid, subject to limitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

III ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT,BAGALKOT TO SIT AT MUDHOL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case