Smt. Renukha W/o Nagappa Goudar, vs Smt. Devakkawwa w/o Hanamant Kalabasappanavar Urf Kalabasappagol, Advocate - P.M.VASTRAD — 314/2016
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section OS. Status: EVIDENCEe. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABK210023162016
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
Filing Number
314/2016
Filing Date
19-09-2016
Registration No
314/2016
Registration Date
19-09-2016
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDHOL
Judge
121-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MUDHOL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Renukha W/o Nagappa Goudar,
Adv. A S Chougala
Smt. Shantawwa W/o Yamanappa Goudar,(Legal Heir) 2.
yamanappa Goudar 2.
Kantu Goudar 2.
Shivu @ Shivanna Goudar(Legal Heir) 2.3.
Sabavva Goudar 2.3.
Priya Goudar
Respondent(s)
Smt. Devakkawwa w/o Hanamant Kalabasappanavar Urf Kalabasappagol, Advocate - P.M.VASTRAD
Smt. Mallawwa W/o Yallappa Naikar Urf Goudar,
Lokanna S/o. Hanamant Kalabasappanavar,
Adv. P.M.VASTRAD
Smt. Saraswati W/o Shrishail Kakanur,
Hebbalappa S/o Yallappa Kalabasappanavar
Adv. P.M.VASTRAD
Smt. Sumitra w/o Prakash Naik,
Smt. Ratnawwa W/o Gurappa Yallatti,
Hanamant S/o Kalabasu Kalabasappanavar Urf Kalabasappagol,
Adv. K.M.Kanagar
Smt. Sunita W/o Hanamant Pujeri,
Krishna S/o Kalabasu Kalabasappanavar Urf Kalabasappagol,
Smt. Yallawwa W/o Arjun Kalabasappanavar Urf Kalabasappagol,
Adv. K.M.Kanagar
Hanamant S/o Krishnappa Chippalakatti,
Ramanna S/o Yallappa Kalabasappanavar Urf Kalabasappagol,
Adv. P.M.VASTRAD
Arjun S/o Yallappa Kalabasappanavar Urf Kalabasappagol,
Adv. K.M.kanagal
Tangewwa Lokanna Kalabasappanavar
Jayashree W/o. Mahadev Shetty
Hearing History
Judge: 121-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MUDHOL
EVIDENCEe
EVIDENCEe
EVIDENCEe
EVIDENCEe
EVIDENCEe
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCEe |
| 31-01-2026 | EVIDENCEe |
| 09-01-2026 | EVIDENCEe |
| 27-11-2025 | EVIDENCEe |
| 10-10-2025 | EVIDENCEe |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed Interim Application No. 6 filed by defendants 1-4 under Section 151 of CPC, permitting them to file their written statement and counter claim despite a five-year delay. The defendants' written statement and counter claim were taken on record, though the defendants were ordered to pay costs of Rs. 2,500 as penalty for the substantial delay. The case concerns a partition and separate possession suit filed by the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed Interim Application No. 6 filed by defendants 1-4 under Section 151 of CPC, permitting them to file their written statement and counter claim despite a five-year delay. The defendants' written statement and counter claim were taken on record, though the defendants were ordered to pay costs of Rs. 2,500 as penalty for the substantial delay. The case concerns a partition and separate possession suit filed by the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts