Manjunath Madagond Hanakuppi vs The Chief Officer, CMC, Mudhol — 630/2025
Case under U.sec. 13 of3 Rw 10 of3 of Birth and Death Act. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled in lok adalath on 14th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KABK210020232025
Filing Number
630/2025
Filing Date
27-Oct-2025
Registration No
630/2025
Registration Date
27-Oct-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDHOL
Judge
121-Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled in lok adalath
Last updated 20-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Manjunath Madagond Hanakuppi
Adv. R P Uppar
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Chief Officer, CMC, Mudhol
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Orders
The Lok Adalath at Mudhol allowed a joint settlement between the petitioner and respondents regarding birth registration. The respondents agreed to register the petitioner's date of birth as 01.06.1995 (born in Mudhol town) in the birth and death register upon payment of requisite fees by the petitioner. The case was settled and closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol
-
06-Mar-2026
A.D.R.
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol
-
30-Jan-2026
EVIDENCEe
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol
-
30-Dec-2025
EVIDENCEe
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol
-
13-Dec-2025
Notice
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol
-
13-Dec-2025
Restored
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol
-
13-Dec-2025
Notice
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol
-
13-Dec-2025
Disposed
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol
-
12-Nov-2025
Notice
Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol
-
28-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 630/2025
The Lok Adalath at Mudhol allowed a joint settlement between the petitioner and respondents regarding birth registration. The respondents agreed to register the petitioner's date of birth as 01.06.1995 (born in Mudhol town) in the birth and death register upon payment of requisite fees by the petitioner. The case was settled and closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts