Mahalingappa Parappa Puranik vs Sandeep S/o Mahadev Kulkarni — 102/2024

Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc. Status: EVIDENCEe. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

EVIDENCEe Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KABK210009892024

Filing Number

102/2024

Filing Date

29-May-2024

Registration No

102/2024

Registration Date

29-May-2024

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDHOL

Judge

121-Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

Last updated 20-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mahalingappa Parappa Puranik

    Adv. A.K.Oswal

  2. 2.Mallappa adopt S/o Rudrappa Navi

  3. 3.Paramanand S/o Mahalingappa Navi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sandeep S/o Mahadev Kulkarni

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    EVIDENCEe

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  3. 23-Jan-2026

    EVIDENCEe

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  4. 05-Dec-2025

    EVIDENCEe

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  5. 10-Oct-2025

    EVIDENCEe

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  6. 21-Aug-2025

    EVIDENCEe

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  7. 11-Jul-2025

    EVIDENCEe

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  8. 11-Jun-2025

    EVIDENCEe

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  9. 16-Apr-2025

    EVIDENCEe

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  10. 05-Feb-2025

    EVIDENCEe

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  11. 16-Jan-2025

    List Of Witness And Documents

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  12. 05-Dec-2024

    List Of Witness And Documents

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  13. 27-Nov-2024

    OrdersView PDF

  14. 27-Nov-2024

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from changing the direction of a small stream on his property (R.S. No. 59) toward the plaintiffs' adjacent lands (R.S. No. 60/4 and 60/5) in Belagali village. The court found the plaintiffs established a prima facie case, demonstrated balance of convenience in their favor, and would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction were not granted, hence allowing their application under CPC Order XXXIX Rules 1-2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  15. 27-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  16. 26-Nov-2024

    Order

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  17. 25-Nov-2024

    Order

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  18. 20-Nov-2024

    Order

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  19. 19-Nov-2024

    Order

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  20. 15-Nov-2024

    Order

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  21. 07-Nov-2024

    Order

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  22. 26-Oct-2024

    Order

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  23. 23-Oct-2024

    Order

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  24. 15-Oct-2024

    Order

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  25. 24-Sep-2024

    Order

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  26. 23-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  27. 18-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  28. 11-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  29. 04-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  30. 28-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  31. 21-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  32. 07-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  33. 31-Jul-2024

    Written statement

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  34. 24-Jul-2024

    Written statement

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  35. 10-Jul-2024

    Written statement

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  36. 13-Jun-2024

    Notice

    Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Mudhol

  37. 30-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 29-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 102/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from changing the direction of a small stream on his property (R.S. No. 59) toward the plaintiffs' adjacent lands (R.S. No. 60/4 and 60/5) in Belagali village. The court found the plaintiffs established a prima facie case, demonstrated balance of convenience in their favor, and would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction were not granted, hence allowing their application under CPC Order XXXIX Rules 1-2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case