Smt Kashibai Laxman Badiger Urf Sutar vs Vittal Krishna Pawar — 85/2025

Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc. Status: EVIDENCEe. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KABK210007442025

EVIDENCEe

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

e-Filing Number

15-04-2025

Filing Number

87/2025

Filing Date

16-04-2025

Registration No

85/2025

Registration Date

16-04-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDHOL

Judge

120-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MUDHOL

Acts & Sections

U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc

Petitioner(s)

Smt Kashibai Laxman Badiger Urf Sutar

Adv. SIDDAPPA PATIL

Basavaraj Laxman Badiger Urf Sutar

Adv. SIDDAPPA PATIL

Kalappa Laxman Badiger Urf Sutar

Adv. SIDDAPPA PATIL

Bhimappa Krishnappa Badiger Urf Sutar

Adv. SIDDAPPA PATIL

Arjun Krishnappa Badiger Urf Sutar

Adv. SIDDAPPA PATIL

Manjunath Krishnappa Badiger Urf Sutar

Adv. SIDDAPPA PATIL

Nagappa Hanamant Hulakund

Adv. SIDDAPPA PATIL

Tippanna Naganna Hulakund

Adv. SIDDAPPA PATIL

Bheerappa Naganna Hulakund

Adv. SIDDAPPA PATIL

Lakkappa Bheerappa Hulakund

Adv. SIDDAPPA PATIL

Mayappa Bheerappa Hulakund

Adv. SIDDAPPA PATIL

Basappa Bheerappa Hulakund

Adv. SIDDAPPA PATIL

Umesh Siddappa Yadawad

Adv. SIDDAPPA PATIL

Respondent(s)

Vittal Krishna Pawar

Hearing History

Judge: 120-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MUDHOL

06-03-2026

EVIDENCEe

08-01-2026

EVIDENCEe

07-11-2025

EVIDENCEe

10-10-2025

EVIDENCEe

19-09-2025

EVIDENCEe

Interim Orders

10-10-2025
Deposition

In Original Suit No. 85/2025, the court adjourned the case to 10-10-2025 for further hearing. The court examined the pleadings and documents filed by both parties under the relevant provisions of the CPC (sections 180, 180/1-180/3, 180/7-180/12, 180/16, and 109) and found that only one party appeared before the court. No further orders or relief were granted in this interim order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In Original Suit No. 85/2025, the court adjourned the case to 10-10-2025 for further hearing. The court examined the pleadings and documents filed by both parties under the relevant provisions of the CPC (sections 180, 180/1-180/3, 180/7-180/12, 180/16, and 109) and found that only one party appeared before the court. No further orders or relief were granted in this interim order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDHOL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case