Smt. Madhuben W/o Narasang Padiyar vs Smt. Shushilabai W/o Ambadas Padatare Advocate - P M Vastrad — 21/2020
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABK210003092020
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
18/2020
Filing Date
10-02-2020
Registration No
21/2020
Registration Date
12-02-2020
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDHOL
Judge
120-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MUDHOL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Madhuben W/o Narasang Padiyar
Adv. A S Yadawad
Respondent(s)
Smt. Shushilabai W/o Ambadas Padatare Advocate - P M Vastrad
Hearing History
Judge: 120-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC MUDHOL
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 12-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 28-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 20-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
The first page of this document contains heavily corrupted/garbled Kannada text that is unreadable. However, the second page contains clear Kannada text from a court order (OS No.21/2020, DW2) dated 08-01-2026. Summary: The court order in OS No.21/2020 addresses a civil dispute involving property matters and monetary claims of Rs. 6,20,000/- dated 29-09-2010. The judgment discusses the court's analysis of evidence presented by both plaintiff and defendant, their respective positions regarding the disputed assets and transaction details, and orders that the case be disposed of with appropriate directions regarding the disputed amount and property claims based on the court's findings on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The first page of this document contains heavily corrupted/garbled Kannada text that is unreadable. However, the second page contains clear Kannada text from a court order (OS No.21/2020, DW2) dated 08-01-2026. Summary: The court order in OS No.21/2020 addresses a civil dispute involving property matters and monetary claims of Rs. 6,20,000/- dated 29-09-2010. The judgment discusses the court's analysis of evidence presented by both plaintiff and defendant, their respective positions regarding the disputed assets and transaction details, and orders that the case be disposed of with appropriate directions regarding the disputed amount and property claims based on the court's findings on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts