Siddappa s/o Sangappa Kankanawadi vs Basavaraj s/o Shrimantagouda Patil — 59/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21,Rule,34(5),R/w151CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED / REJECTED OTHERWISE on 06th March 2026.
EX - Execution Petition Under Order
CNR: KABK200013672024
Filing Number
59/2024
Filing Date
07-08-2024
Registration No
59/2024
Registration Date
07-08-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDHOL
Judge
1117-Sr.Civil Judge and JMFC., Mudhol
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED / REJECTED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Siddappa s/o Sangappa Kankanawadi
Adv. K V Kulkarni
Respondent(s)
Basavaraj s/o Shrimantagouda Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1117-Sr.Civil Judge and JMFC., Mudhol
Disposed
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 16-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 31-01-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 21-01-2026 | SUMMONS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The JMFC Mudhol dismissed petition EX No.59/2024 for non-prosecution. The court found that despite sufficient time being granted, the court commissioner failed to submit his report and DHR (Dharwad?) did not take necessary steps, resulting in dismissal due to lack of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The JMFC Mudhol dismissed petition EX No.59/2024 for non-prosecution. The court found that despite sufficient time being granted, the court commissioner failed to submit his report and DHR (Dharwad?) did not take necessary steps, resulting in dismissal due to lack of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts