Smt. Annapurna w/o Shankrayya Govindapurmath vs Parayya s/o Iratayya Govindapurmath — 7/2023
Case under U Sec 96 R/w Order 41 Rule 1 of Cpc. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
R.A. - Regular Appeals
CNR: KABK200011442023
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
Filing Number
7/2023
Filing Date
26-05-2023
Registration No
7/2023
Registration Date
26-05-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDHOL
Judge
1117-Sr.Civil Judge and JMFC., Mudhol
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Annapurna w/o Shankrayya Govindapurmath
Adv. M.B.Hiremath
Kashinath s/o Shankrayya Govindapurmath
Sushma w/o Vishwanath Govindapurmath
Abhiskek s/o Vishwanath Govindapurmath
Respondent(s)
Parayya s/o Iratayya Govindapurmath
Smt Draxayani w/o Gurupadayya Hiremath
Smt. Surekha w/o Karabasayya Hiremath
Hearing History
Judge: 1117-Sr.Civil Judge and JMFC., Mudhol
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
HEARING
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 21-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 07-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 13-01-2026 | HEARING |
| 18-12-2025 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed with Costs The court allowed the appellants' petition for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and admitted their regular appeal (Case No. 07/2023) against the trial court's partial decree dated 27.02.2019 in Original Case No. 249/2013. The appellants had delayed filing the appeal by 1516 days due to financial hardship, which the court found justified. The court imposed costs of ₹2,000 on the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed with Costs The court allowed the appellants' petition for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and admitted their regular appeal (Case No. 07/2023) against the trial court's partial decree dated 27.02.2019 in Original Case No. 249/2013. The appellants had delayed filing the appeal by 1516 days due to financial hardship, which the court found justified. The court imposed costs of ₹2,000 on the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts