Kastrurevva Madar W/o Gangappa Madar vs Balavva Gudihind W/o Hanamappa Gudihind — 207/2020
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 Cpc. Disposed: Contested--DECREED AFTER FULL TRIAL on 06th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABK200010492020
Filing Number
208/2020
Filing Date
25-11-2020
Registration No
207/2020
Registration Date
25-11-2020
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDHOL
Judge
1117-Sr.Civil Judge and JMFC., Mudhol
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED AFTER FULL TRIAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kastrurevva Madar W/o Gangappa Madar
Adv. Nagaraj K Pujar
Respondent(s)
Balavva Gudihind W/o Hanamappa Gudihind
Tayavva Madar D/o Late Dashageerappa
Shantavva Madar W/o Rajappa
Giriyappa Madar S/o Late dashageerappa
Hearing History
Judge: 1117-Sr.Civil Judge and JMFC., Mudhol
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 03-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 31-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 20-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, entitling her to 1/5 (one-fifth) share in the suit schedule properties as a legal heir of the deceased ancestral joint family properties. The court found that the plaintiff and defendants 1-4 are legitimate first-class legal heirs entitled to equal shares, rejecting the defendants' claim of prior partition and finding no valid documentation supporting their alleged separate ownership of the properties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, entitling her to 1/5 (one-fifth) share in the suit schedule properties as a legal heir of the deceased ancestral joint family properties. The court found that the plaintiff and defendants 1-4 are legitimate first-class legal heirs entitled to equal shares, rejecting the defendants' claim of prior partition and finding no valid documentation supporting their alleged separate ownership of the properties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts