Sri. Prakash S/o. Muralidhar Kalal vs Sri. Ashok S/o. Ningappa Pujar — 428/2024
Case under 138 of N.i.act. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KABK200009672024
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
428/2024
Filing Date
07-06-2024
Registration No
428/2024
Registration Date
07-06-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDHOL
Judge
1193-Addl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sri. Prakash S/o. Muralidhar Kalal
Adv. T.C. Betasur
Respondent(s)
Sri. Ashok S/o. Ningappa Pujar
Hearing History
Judge: 1193-Addl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
CROSS OF PW 1
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 20-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 19-02-2026 | CROSS OF PW 1 |
| 05-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 17-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary This is a civil suit (S.S. No. 428/2024) dated 20-02-2026 from a Karnataka court, written in Kannada. The court dismissed the plaintiff's petition regarding a monetary dispute involving Rs. 1 lakh, Rs. 3 lakh 50 thousand, and related claims concerning property and financial transactions. The court found that the plaintiff failed to substantiate key allegations and that certain documentary evidence (Exhibit 7) was inadequately proven, resulting in the rejection of the suit with directions regarding cost allocation and party responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary This is a civil suit (S.S. No. 428/2024) dated 20-02-2026 from a Karnataka court, written in Kannada. The court dismissed the plaintiff's petition regarding a monetary dispute involving Rs. 1 lakh, Rs. 3 lakh 50 thousand, and related claims concerning property and financial transactions. The court found that the plaintiff failed to substantiate key allegations and that certain documentary evidence (Exhibit 7) was inadequately proven, resulting in the rejection of the suit with directions regarding cost allocation and party responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts