Sri. Prakash S/o. Muralidhar Kalal vs Sri. Ashok S/o. Ningappa Pujar — 428/2024

Case under 138 of N.i.act. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KABK200009672024

ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

26th March 2026

Filing Number

428/2024

Filing Date

07-06-2024

Registration No

428/2024

Registration Date

07-06-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDHOL

Judge

1193-Addl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC

Acts & Sections

138 of N.i.act

Petitioner(s)

Sri. Prakash S/o. Muralidhar Kalal

Adv. T.C. Betasur

Respondent(s)

Sri. Ashok S/o. Ningappa Pujar

Hearing History

Judge: 1193-Addl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC

06-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

20-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

19-02-2026

CROSS OF PW 1

05-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

17-01-2026

ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

13-11-2025
Deposition
20-02-2026
Deposition
20-02-2026
Deposition

Court Order Summary This is a civil suit (S.S. No. 428/2024) dated 20-02-2026 from a Karnataka court, written in Kannada. The court dismissed the plaintiff's petition regarding a monetary dispute involving Rs. 1 lakh, Rs. 3 lakh 50 thousand, and related claims concerning property and financial transactions. The court found that the plaintiff failed to substantiate key allegations and that certain documentary evidence (Exhibit 7) was inadequately proven, resulting in the rejection of the suit with directions regarding cost allocation and party responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary This is a civil suit (S.S. No. 428/2024) dated 20-02-2026 from a Karnataka court, written in Kannada. The court dismissed the plaintiff's petition regarding a monetary dispute involving Rs. 1 lakh, Rs. 3 lakh 50 thousand, and related claims concerning property and financial transactions. The court found that the plaintiff failed to substantiate key allegations and that certain documentary evidence (Exhibit 7) was inadequately proven, resulting in the rejection of the suit with directions regarding cost allocation and party responsibilities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDHOL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case