Smt. Shivakka @ Shivava W/o Yamanappa Saganoor vs Smt. Gangawwa W/o Laxmappa Kuri Advocate - B.S.Kantimath — 129/2020
Case under Vii Rule I Cpc Section CPC. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KABK200007282020
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
129/2020
Filing Date
23-07-2020
Registration No
129/2020
Registration Date
23-07-2020
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MUDHOL
Judge
1117-Sr.Civil Judge and JMFC., Mudhol
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Shivakka @ Shivava W/o Yamanappa Saganoor
Adv. P.M.Vastrad
Respondent(s)
Smt. Gangawwa W/o Laxmappa Kuri Advocate - B.S.Kantimath
Sri. Shivarayappa S/o Laxmappa Kuri
Adv. V.K.Salamantapi
Smt. Kamalawwa W/o Pandappa Kuri
Smt. Geeta W/o Gopal Saganoor
Adv. R.G.Naragund
Sri. Benappa S/o Pandappa kuri
Sri. Anand S/o Pandappa Kuri
Kumari. Hema D/o Pandappa Kuri
Sri. Adivveppa S/o Laxmappa Kuri
Adv. B.S.Kantimath
Sri. Rvi S/o Adiveppa Kuri
Adv. B.S.Kantimath
Sri. Manju S/o Adiveppa Kuri
Adv. B.S.Kantimath
Sri. Hanamanth S/o Laxmappa Kuri
Adv. B.S.Kantimath
Sri. Rangappa S/o Laxmappa Kuri
Sri. Ramappa S/o Venkappa Guraddi(Legal Heir)
Adv. R.G.Naragund
Sri. Basappa S/o Bhimappa Choudagan
Adv. R.G.Naragund
Sri. Laxman S/o Shivarayappa Kuri
Smt. Hanamawwa W/o Hanamath Kulali
Defendent 13 A Kasturi Ramappa Guraddi
Hearing History
Judge: 1117-Sr.Civil Judge and JMFC., Mudhol
HEARING
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
CROSS OF PW 1
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 25-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-02-2026 | CROSS OF PW 1 |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The court dismissed the defendants' interim application (Application No. 14) seeking to strike out the plaintiff's written statement. The plaintiff sought partition of joint family properties, claiming the defendants refused to grant her share despite her request on 05.07.2020. The court found that the written statement adequately disclosed a cause of action regarding disputed joint family assets, and the defects raised by defendants in their application were not grounds for rejection at this stage. The case was ordered to proceed to trial for substantive determination of the parties' claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The court dismissed the defendants' interim application (Application No. 14) seeking to strike out the plaintiff's written statement. The plaintiff sought partition of joint family properties, claiming the defendants refused to grant her share despite her request on 05.07.2020. The court found that the written statement adequately disclosed a cause of action regarding disputed joint family assets, and the defects raised by defendants in their application were not grounds for rejection at this stage. The case was ordered to proceed to trial for substantive determination of the parties' claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts