The SLAO BTDA Bagalkot vs Sangayya Gangadharayya Nashi deceased by LRs — 500/2017

Case under Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013 Section 76. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.

L.A.C. - Land Acquisition Cases

CNR: KABK010039602017

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

28th March 2026

Filing Number

500/2017

Filing Date

07-12-2017

Registration No

500/2017

Registration Date

13-12-2017

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT

Judge

1567-V Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

Acts & Sections

LAND ACQUISITION REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT 2013 Section 76

Petitioner(s)

The SLAO BTDA Bagalkot

Adv. PRABHAKAR SANGAPPA DADDENAVAR

Respondent(s)

Sangayya Gangadharayya Nashi deceased by LRs

Basavva Irappa Kotekall

Lalita W/o. Holebasappa Yandigeri ..................................Awardees

Somashekharayya S/o. Sangayya Nashimath @ Herakalamath

Adv. MAHANTESH CHANAYYA HIREMATH

M.B. Nadagoudar

Guru V Nashi ......... Objectors

Adv. T.R.KULKARNI,

Hearing History

Judge: 1567-V Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

21-02-2026

EVIDENCE

13-01-2026

EVIDENCE

03-01-2026

SUMMONS

19-12-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

13-10-2025
Deposition

In LAC No. 500/2017, the court examined witnesses RW-1 and RW-2 on 13.10.2025, whose testimonies were recorded and certified as truthful. The court admitted documentary evidence (NR-1 to NR-3) under the Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 12(2) and 2013 Act Section 24(1-A), and adjourned the main hearing for further examination of the 6th opponent's witness. The case continues with adjournment for completion of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In LAC No. 500/2017, the court examined witnesses RW-1 and RW-2 on 13.10.2025, whose testimonies were recorded and certified as truthful. The court admitted documentary evidence (NR-1 to NR-3) under the Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 12(2) and 2013 Act Section 24(1-A), and adjourned the main hearing for further examination of the 6th opponent's witness. The case continues with adjournment for completion of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case