The State of Karnataka vs Shavakka W/o Yanakkappa Meti Advocate - MAINUDDIN M KANDAGAL — 80/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th March 2026.

SC - SESSION CASES

CNR: KABK010035832023

Case disposed

Filing Number

80/2023

Filing Date

15-12-2023

Registration No

80/2023

Registration Date

15-12-2023

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT

Judge

107-DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 302

Petitioner(s)

The State of Karnataka

Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

Respondent(s)

Shavakka W/o Yanakkappa Meti Advocate - MAINUDDIN M KANDAGAL

Hearing History

Judge: 107-DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT

13-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

03-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

25-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

17-02-2026

ARGUMENTES

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Judgment

Court Decision Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge of Bagalkote acquitted Shavakka W/o Yankappa Meti of the murder charge under Section 302 IPC. The court found that while the deceased died a homicidal death, the prosecution failed to prove the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the circumstantial evidence (motive, extra-judicial confession, and weapon recovery) was insufficient and incomplete, leaving reasonable doubt about the accused's involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

19-07-2024
Charge
23-07-2025
Deposition
03-09-2025
Deposition
23-10-2025
Deposition
12-11-2025
Deposition
27-11-2025
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge of Bagalkote acquitted Shavakka W/o Yankappa Meti of the murder charge under Section 302 IPC. The court found that while the deceased died a homicidal death, the prosecution failed to prove the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the circumstantial evidence (motive, extra-judicial confession, and weapon recovery) was insufficient and incomplete, leaving reasonable doubt about the accused's involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case