The State of Karnataka vs Shavakka W/o Yanakkappa Meti Advocate - MAINUDDIN M KANDAGAL — 80/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th March 2026.
SC - SESSION CASES
CNR: KABK010035832023
Filing Number
80/2023
Filing Date
15-12-2023
Registration No
80/2023
Registration Date
15-12-2023
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT
Judge
107-DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Karnataka
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
Respondent(s)
Shavakka W/o Yanakkappa Meti Advocate - MAINUDDIN M KANDAGAL
Hearing History
Judge: 107-DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 03-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 25-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 17-02-2026 | ARGUMENTES |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge of Bagalkote acquitted Shavakka W/o Yankappa Meti of the murder charge under Section 302 IPC. The court found that while the deceased died a homicidal death, the prosecution failed to prove the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the circumstantial evidence (motive, extra-judicial confession, and weapon recovery) was insufficient and incomplete, leaving reasonable doubt about the accused's involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge of Bagalkote acquitted Shavakka W/o Yankappa Meti of the murder charge under Section 302 IPC. The court found that while the deceased died a homicidal death, the prosecution failed to prove the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the circumstantial evidence (motive, extra-judicial confession, and weapon recovery) was insufficient and incomplete, leaving reasonable doubt about the accused's involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts