Shankrappa Ramappa Kakaraddi vs The S.L.A.O. Malaprabha and Ghataprabha Project No.3 Bagalkot Advocate - Special Government counsel — 1151/2018
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section U/Sec 64(1). Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
L.A.C. - Land Acquisition Cases
CNR: KABK010031682018
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
1151/2018
Filing Date
12-09-2018
Registration No
1151/2018
Registration Date
12-09-2018
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT
Judge
1567-V Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shankrappa Ramappa Kakaraddi
Adv. B D Patil
Respondent(s)
The S.L.A.O. Malaprabha and Ghataprabha Project No.3 Bagalkot Advocate - Special Government counsel
Executive Engineer KNN,MBC Division No.1 Gaddanakeri Camp Bagalkot
Adv. K M Purohith
Hearing History
Judge: 1567-V Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 21-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 05-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 13-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 05-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary In LAC No. 1151/2018, the court examined a land dispute regarding property in Hoolagere village. The court found that the respondent's witness (PW-1) provided false testimony regarding the land's features, water sources, and the neem trees on the property. The court accepted the petitioner's arguments that certain legal provisions (NP-6, NP-7) do not apply to the disputed land and directed the local administration to conduct a proper survey and provide appropriate compensation to the petitioner for the damaged property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In LAC No. 1151/2018, the court examined a land dispute regarding property in Hoolagere village. The court found that the respondent's witness (PW-1) provided false testimony regarding the land's features, water sources, and the neem trees on the property. The court accepted the petitioner's arguments that certain legal provisions (NP-6, NP-7) do not apply to the disputed land and directed the local administration to conduct a proper survey and provide appropriate compensation to the petitioner for the damaged property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts