Basavaraj S/o Avvanneppa Kumbar vs The State of Karnataka R/by PP Bagalkote — 89/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/sec, 415,(374, of Cr.P.C). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.
CRL.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: KABK010026722024
e-Filing Number
23-11-2024
Filing Number
89/2024
Filing Date
25-11-2024
Registration No
89/2024
Registration Date
25-11-2024
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT
Judge
1181-II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Basavaraj S/o Avvanneppa Kumbar
Adv. K.Y.Niranjan
Respondent(s)
The State of Karnataka R/by PP (Public Prosecutor) Bagalkote
Hearing History
Judge: 1181-II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 28-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 27-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 21-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The appellate court dismissed the criminal appeal and confirmed the trial court's conviction of Basavaraj for assaulting a customer (PW1) at a fair price shop on October 15, 2012. The court upheld the conviction under IPC Sections 326 (causing grievous hurt) and 506(2) (criminal intimidation), sentencing him to 3 years rigorous imprisonment with a ₹10,000 fine for grievous hurt, plus 1 year simple imprisonment for criminal intimidation. The court found credible eyewitness testimony, medical evidence of serious head injuries, and rejected appellant's claims of false prosecution based on conflicting witness accounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The appellate court dismissed the criminal appeal and confirmed the trial court's conviction of Basavaraj for assaulting a customer (PW1) at a fair price shop on October 15, 2012. The court upheld the conviction under IPC Sections 326 (causing grievous hurt) and 506(2) (criminal intimidation), sentencing him to 3 years rigorous imprisonment with a ₹10,000 fine for grievous hurt, plus 1 year simple imprisonment for criminal intimidation. The court found credible eyewitness testimony, medical evidence of serious head injuries, and rejected appellant's claims of false prosecution based on conflicting witness accounts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts