Ramanna Basappa Alli vs The SLAO, MP-3 Bagalkot Advocate - SHANKRANNA LAXMANRAO KORA — 921/2019
Case under Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013 Section U/s.64(1). Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
L.A.C. - Land Acquisition Cases
CNR: KABK010025402019
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
921/2019
Filing Date
04-07-2019
Registration No
921/2019
Registration Date
04-07-2019
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT
Judge
1181-II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramanna Basappa Alli
Adv. LAXMAPPA BASAPPA GADIGENNAVAR
Rangappa Basappa Alli
Respondent(s)
The SLAO, MP-3 Bagalkot Advocate - SHANKRANNA LAXMANRAO KORA
The Exective Engineer MLBC Div-1
The District Commissioner, Navanagar, Bagalkot.
Hearing History
Judge: 1181-II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 17-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 16-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 11-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a land dispute case (L.A.C.921/2019) in Karnataka involving competing claims over agricultural land near Bangalore. The court, through testimony of witness PW.01 recorded on 09-03-2026, examined disputed facts about the land's nature, value, and prior government inspection. The judgment finds the witness's statements regarding false claims about the land's productivity and value to be credible, while accepting the respondents' counter-arguments. The case involves land acquisition and resettlement matters under the jurisdiction of the Additional District Judge and Land Acquisition Authority, Bangalore. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a land dispute case (L.A.C.921/2019) in Karnataka involving competing claims over agricultural land near Bangalore. The court, through testimony of witness PW.01 recorded on 09-03-2026, examined disputed facts about the land's nature, value, and prior government inspection. The judgment finds the witness's statements regarding false claims about the land's productivity and value to be credible, while accepting the respondents' counter-arguments. The case involves land acquisition and resettlement matters under the jurisdiction of the Additional District Judge and Land Acquisition Authority, Bangalore. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts