The State of Karnataka vs Channabasayya Adivayya Hiremath — 54/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/s143,323,307,354(B),504,506R/W34IPC. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
SC - SESSION CASES
CNR: KABK010022212024
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
Filing Number
54/2024
Filing Date
20-09-2024
Registration No
54/2024
Registration Date
20-09-2024
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT
Judge
107-DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Karnataka
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
Channabasayya Adivayya Hiremath
Suma Channabasayya Hiremath
Ambaji Ashok Zingade
Vinayak Ashok Zingade
Shantabai Ashok Zingade
Hearing History
Judge: 107-DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 12-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 24-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 12-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a criminal case (Crime No. 54/2024) from the Principal District and Sessions Court, Bagalkot. A witness (35-year-old taxi driver) testified on 13.11.2025 regarding an incident of alleged domestic violence that occurred on 15.03.2024. The court examined the witness's testimony regarding the location and circumstances of the alleged assault, and the witness identified certain place-related evidence (marked as Exhibit P-1) and photographs (marked as Exhibit P-2) during examination-in-chief. No further cross-examination was conducted, and the case record shows the judge accepted the witness testimony as presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a criminal case (Crime No. 54/2024) from the Principal District and Sessions Court, Bagalkot. A witness (35-year-old taxi driver) testified on 13.11.2025 regarding an incident of alleged domestic violence that occurred on 15.03.2024. The court examined the witness's testimony regarding the location and circumstances of the alleged assault, and the witness identified certain place-related evidence (marked as Exhibit P-1) and photographs (marked as Exhibit P-2) during examination-in-chief. No further cross-examination was conducted, and the case record shows the judge accepted the witness testimony as presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts