The STate of Karnataka vs Maruti Basappa Bajantri — 53/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/s120(B),302,201R/W34IPC. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

SC - SESSION CASES

CNR: KABK010021742024

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

Filing Number

53/2024

Filing Date

12-09-2024

Registration No

53/2024

Registration Date

12-09-2024

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT

Judge

1181-II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section U/s120(B),302,201R/W34IPC

Petitioner(s)

The STate of Karnataka

Adv. PP

Respondent(s)

Maruti Basappa Bajantri

Balavva Basavaraj Vaggar

Sunil Hanamappa Bajantri

Hearing History

Judge: 1181-II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

27-02-2026

EVIDENCE

20-02-2026

EVIDENCE

07-02-2026

EVIDENCE

30-01-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

22-08-2025
Deposition
29-11-2025
Deposition
26-12-2025
Deposition
30-01-2026
Deposition
07-02-2026
Deposition
20-02-2026
Deposition
27-02-2026
Deposition

Case Summary - S.C. 53/2024 This is a murder case (murder of one Basavaraj) heard before the District and Sessions Court, Hunagund. The court document records witness examination proceedings dated 27-02-2026. Three prosecution witnesses (P.W. 12, 13, and 14) testified; each witness retracted or contradicted their earlier police statements, claiming they gave false statements to assist the accused. The court allowed cross-examination as hostile witnesses for each. No adjournment was ordered and proceedings continued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - S.C. 53/2024 This is a murder case (murder of one Basavaraj) heard before the District and Sessions Court, Hunagund. The court document records witness examination proceedings dated 27-02-2026. Three prosecution witnesses (P.W. 12, 13, and 14) testified; each witness retracted or contradicted their earlier police statements, claiming they gave false statements to assist the accused. The court allowed cross-examination as hostile witnesses for each. No adjournment was ordered and proceedings continued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case