The Additional Special Land Acquisition Officer No.01 UKP Navanagar Bagalkote vs Sidramappa Badakannavar S/o Shivappa Govt And Others — 440/2024

Case under Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act Section 76&77. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 06th March 2026.

L.A.C. - Land Acquisition Cases

CNR: KABK010016942024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

05-04-2024

Filing Number

440/2024

Filing Date

11-07-2024

Registration No

440/2024

Registration Date

11-07-2024

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT

Judge

1181-II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act Section 76&77

Petitioner(s)

The Additional Special Land Acquisition Officer No.01 UKP Navanagar Bagalkote

Adv. NIL

Respondent(s)

Sidramappa Badakannavar S/o Shivappa Govt And Others

Parasappa Badakannavar S/o Shivappa

Hearing History

Judge: 1181-II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

06-03-2026

Disposed

28-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

27-02-2026

EVIDENCE

21-02-2026

EVIDENCE

03-01-2026

NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
Judgment

Summary The II Additional District Judge, Bagalkote declared Sidramappa and Parasappa (opponents) as joint absolute owners of 6 guntas of acquired land at Kadiwal Kallapur village and entitled them to receive the compensation amount of Rs. 1,69,677/- jointly. The court found that the land acquisition officer properly deposited the disputed compensation with the court under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act because the two co-owners had individually claimed sole ownership, preventing payment, and they are now willing to receive it jointly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

28-02-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The II Additional District Judge, Bagalkote declared Sidramappa and Parasappa (opponents) as joint absolute owners of 6 guntas of acquired land at Kadiwal Kallapur village and entitled them to receive the compensation amount of Rs. 1,69,677/- jointly. The court found that the land acquisition officer properly deposited the disputed compensation with the court under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act because the two co-owners had individually claimed sole ownership, preventing payment, and they are now willing to receive it jointly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case