The State of Karnataka vs Raju Nagappa Waddar — 20/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,354,504,R/w,34,of,IPC. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th March 2026.
SC - SESSION CASES
CNR: KABK010015002023
Filing Number
20/2023
Filing Date
28-04-2023
Registration No
20/2023
Registration Date
28-04-2023
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT
Judge
1566-IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Karnataka
Adv. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
Respondent(s)
Raju Nagappa Waddar
Sharanu Shivananda Sajjan
Arun Kalloleppa Waddar
Maruti Laxman Govindannavar
Hearing History
Judge: 1566-IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTES
ARGUMENTES
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 17-02-2026 | ARGUMENTES |
| 03-02-2026 | ARGUMENTES |
| 20-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
The document is in Kannada, a South Indian language. While the text is technically readable, the judgment appears to consist primarily of repetitive witness examination records (witness testimonies PW.1 through PW.9) that follow nearly identical patterns regarding an alleged assault incident dated March 7, 2020, in Bagalkot district. The witnesses' statements are largely contradictory or non-committal regarding the incident details. SUMMARY: This Session Case No. 20/2023 from the 4th Additional District and Sessions Court (Special Court), Bagalkot involves an alleged assault incident with lathi (stick) blows. The court examined multiple witnesses (PW.1-PW.9) whose testimonies were largely inconsistent and evasive—most witnesses either denied witnessing the assault, claimed lack of knowledge about the incident, or stated they reconciled with the accused. The prosecution recorded statements from complainants and bystanders, but the evidence presented was reportedly insufficient or unreliable, with witnesses frequently denying prior police statements and reconciliation with the accused undermining the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The document is in Kannada, a South Indian language. While the text is technically readable, the judgment appears to consist primarily of repetitive witness examination records (witness testimonies PW.1 through PW.9) that follow nearly identical patterns regarding an alleged assault incident dated March 7, 2020, in Bagalkot district. The witnesses' statements are largely contradictory or non-committal regarding the incident details. SUMMARY: This Session Case No. 20/2023 from the 4th Additional District and Sessions Court (Special Court), Bagalkot involves an alleged assault incident with lathi (stick) blows. The court examined multiple witnesses (PW.1-PW.9) whose testimonies were largely inconsistent and evasive—most witnesses either denied witnessing the assault, claimed lack of knowledge about the incident, or stated they reconciled with the accused. The prosecution recorded statements from complainants and bystanders, but the evidence presented was reportedly insufficient or unreliable, with witnesses frequently denying prior police statements and reconciliation with the accused undermining the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts