M. H. Bhoosanur, Supervisor ( Parupattegara ) Mudhol Depot vs The Divisional Controller, NWKRTC Bagalkot Division, Bagalkot — 9/2023

Case under U/sec 10(1)(C) of I.d. Act 1947 Section U/Sec,10(1)(C),of,ID,Act. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

IDact of S10 1 c - Industrial Disputes u/s 101 c

CNR: KABK010013632023

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

Filing Number

9/2023

Filing Date

17-04-2023

Registration No

9/2023

Registration Date

17-04-2023

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT

Judge

107-DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT

Acts & Sections

U/sec 10(1)(C) of I.d. Act 1947 Section U/Sec,10(1)(C),of,ID,Act

Petitioner(s)

M. H. Bhoosanur, Supervisor ( Parupattegara ) Mudhol Depot

Adv. NIL

Respondent(s)

The Divisional Controller, NWKRTC Bagalkot Division, Bagalkot

Hearing History

Judge: 107-DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

13-02-2026

EVIDENCE

23-01-2026

EVIDENCE

26-12-2025

EVIDENCE

05-12-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

21-12-2024
Orders

Petition Allowed (Maintainability): The District and Sessions Judge, Bagalkot, rejected the respondent's contention that the petition is not maintainable and held that whether the petitioner qualifies as a "workman" under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is a mixed question of law and fact that cannot be determined without a full trial and evidence. The petition is therefore maintainable, and the question of maintainability shall be considered only after the full-fledged trial on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Petition Allowed (Maintainability): The District and Sessions Judge, Bagalkot, rejected the respondent's contention that the petition is not maintainable and held that whether the petitioner qualifies as a "workman" under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is a mixed question of law and fact that cannot be determined without a full trial and evidence. The petition is therefore maintainable, and the question of maintainability shall be considered only after the full-fledged trial on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case