Murigeppa urf Murugesh S/o Irappa Masabinal vs The State of Karnataka R/by PP Bagalkote — 129/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/sec.482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KABK010009082026

e-Filing Number

27-02-2026

Filing Number

129/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

129/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT

Judge

107-District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 20-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/sec.482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Murigeppa urf Murugesh S/o Irappa Masabinal

    Adv. Anil Dalawai

  2. 2.Nagappa S/o Yamanappa Talawar

    Adv. Anil Dalawai

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Karnataka R/by PP (Public Prosecutor) Bagalkote

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners accused of illegally transporting 86 bottles of liquor (64.5 liters) for sale under the Karnataka Excise Act. The judge found that while evidence suggests their involvement, the offenses are not capital or life-imprisonment crimes, and establishing guilt requires trial. The petitioners were released on personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with sureties, subject to conditions including appearing before investigating officers, not tampering with witnesses, and not leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Order

    District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 129/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners accused of illegally transporting 86 bottles of liquor (64.5 liters) for sale under the Karnataka Excise Act. The judge found that while evidence suggests their involvement, the offenses are not capital or life-imprisonment crimes, and establishing guilt requires trial. The petitioners were released on personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with sureties, subject to conditions including appearing before investigating officers, not tampering with witnesses, and not leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case