Vireesh Allayya Saraganachari vs The state of Karanataka , PP Bagalkote — 127/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/sec. 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 06th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KABK010009032026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
127/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
127/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT
Judge
107-District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 20-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vireesh Allayya Saraganachari
Adv. PANDURANGA NIJAGUNI
-
2.Gangayya Basayya Hiremath
Adv. PANDURANGA NIJAGUNI
Respondent(s)
-
1.The state of Karanataka , PP (Public Prosecutor) Bagalkote
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge of Bagalkote granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners (Veeresh and Gangayya) accused of assault and abuse at a hotel. The court found that since the complaint initially named unknown persons and petitioners were identified only through CCTV footage verification, formal guilt could not be established at that stage. Given the charges were not capital offenses, the court permitted bail on Rs. 50,000 personal bond each, subject to conditions including appearance before investigating officers, cooperation with interrogation, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot
-
04-Mar-2026
Order
District And Sessions Judge Bagalkot
-
28-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 127/2026
Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge of Bagalkote granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners (Veeresh and Gangayya) accused of assault and abuse at a hotel. The court found that since the complaint initially named unknown persons and petitioners were identified only through CCTV footage verification, formal guilt could not be established at that stage. Given the charges were not capital offenses, the court permitted bail on Rs. 50,000 personal bond each, subject to conditions including appearance before investigating officers, cooperation with interrogation, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts