Vireesh Allayya Saraganachari vs The state of Karanataka , PP Bagalkote — 127/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/sec. 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 06th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KABK010009032026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

127/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

127/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT

Judge

107-DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/sec. 482

Petitioner(s)

Vireesh Allayya Saraganachari

Adv. PANDURANGA NIJAGUNI

Gangayya Basayya Hiremath

Adv. PANDURANGA NIJAGUNI

Respondent(s)

The state of Karanataka , PP (Public Prosecutor) Bagalkote

Hearing History

Judge: 107-DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT

06-03-2026

Disposed

04-03-2026

ORDER

28-02-2026

OBJECTIONS

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
Orders

Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge of Bagalkote granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners (Veeresh and Gangayya) accused of assault and abuse at a hotel. The court found that since the complaint initially named unknown persons and petitioners were identified only through CCTV footage verification, formal guilt could not be established at that stage. Given the charges were not capital offenses, the court permitted bail on Rs. 50,000 personal bond each, subject to conditions including appearance before investigating officers, cooperation with interrogation, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge of Bagalkote granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners (Veeresh and Gangayya) accused of assault and abuse at a hotel. The court found that since the complaint initially named unknown persons and petitioners were identified only through CCTV footage verification, formal guilt could not be established at that stage. Given the charges were not capital offenses, the court permitted bail on Rs. 50,000 personal bond each, subject to conditions including appearance before investigating officers, cooperation with interrogation, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case