Vireesh Allayya Saraganachari vs The state of Karanataka , PP Bagalkote — 127/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/sec. 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 06th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KABK010009032026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
127/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
127/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT
Judge
107-DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vireesh Allayya Saraganachari
Adv. PANDURANGA NIJAGUNI
Gangayya Basayya Hiremath
Adv. PANDURANGA NIJAGUNI
Respondent(s)
The state of Karanataka , PP (Public Prosecutor) Bagalkote
Hearing History
Judge: 107-DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT
Disposed
ORDER
OBJECTIONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 28-02-2026 | OBJECTIONS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge of Bagalkote granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners (Veeresh and Gangayya) accused of assault and abuse at a hotel. The court found that since the complaint initially named unknown persons and petitioners were identified only through CCTV footage verification, formal guilt could not be established at that stage. Given the charges were not capital offenses, the court permitted bail on Rs. 50,000 personal bond each, subject to conditions including appearance before investigating officers, cooperation with interrogation, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Principal District and Sessions Judge of Bagalkote granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners (Veeresh and Gangayya) accused of assault and abuse at a hotel. The court found that since the complaint initially named unknown persons and petitioners were identified only through CCTV footage verification, formal guilt could not be established at that stage. Given the charges were not capital offenses, the court permitted bail on Rs. 50,000 personal bond each, subject to conditions including appearance before investigating officers, cooperation with interrogation, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts