Sandeep S/o Siddappa Gherade vs The State Of Karnataka R/by PI Bagalkote Town PS — 125/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/sec. 483. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 10th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KABK010008842026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
125/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
125/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT
Judge
107-DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sandeep S/o Siddappa Gherade
Adv. VISHAL LAMANI
Respondent(s)
The State Of Karnataka R/by PI Bagalkote Town PS (Police Station)
Hearing History
Judge: 107-DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BAGALKOT
Disposed
ORDER
ARGUMENTES
ARGUMENTES
OBJECTIONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDER |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTES |
| 04-03-2026 | ARGUMENTES |
| 27-02-2026 | OBJECTIONS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bagalkote rejected the bail petition filed by Sandeep Gherade under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the petitioner's involvement in a communal stone-pelting incident on February 20, 2026—a retaliatory act following an earlier incident on February 19—was serious and required restraint, noting the large-scale police deployment and public disturbance caused. The court reasoned that granting bail during the ongoing investigation would send a wrong message to society and risk further communal violence between community groups. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bagalkote rejected the bail petition filed by Sandeep Gherade under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the petitioner's involvement in a communal stone-pelting incident on February 20, 2026—a retaliatory act following an earlier incident on February 19—was serious and required restraint, noting the large-scale police deployment and public disturbance caused. The court reasoned that granting bail during the ongoing investigation would send a wrong message to society and risk further communal violence between community groups. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts