Havalavva W/o Rangappa Madar vs The SLAO MP No.3 Bagalkot Advocate - DGP — 27/2020

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section U/s.64(1). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

L.A.C. - Land Acquisition Cases

CNR: KABK010000672020

Filing Number

27/2020

Filing Date

04-Jan-2020

Registration No

27/2020

Registration Date

07-Jan-2020

Court

PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT

Judge

1566-IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 20-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section U/s.64(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Havalavva W/o Rangappa Madar

    Adv. Ramachandra Giriyappa Police

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The SLAO MP No.3 Bagalkot Advocate - DGP

  2. 2.The Executive Engineer, KNN Ltd Dv No.1 Bagalkot

    Adv. KMP

  3. 3.The DC Bagalkot

    Adv. DGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The court allowed the land acquisition compensation reference petitions in part, determining that four agricultural landowners from Chabbi village are entitled to enhanced compensation for their land acquired for the Ghataprabha irrigation project. The court rejected the original award valuations as inadequate and fixed the base land value at Rs. 7,75,000 per gunta (based on comparable sale deed evidence), with claimants entitled to a 2x multiplier, 12% annual additional market value, and 9-15% interest as per the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in LARR Act, 2013. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Argumentes

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  5. 04-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  6. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  8. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  9. 31-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  10. 01-Aug-2025

    Appearance Of Party

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  11. 22-Jul-2025

    Appearance Of Party

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  12. 17-Sep-2024

    Appearance Of Party

    II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  13. 16-Sep-2024

    Appearance Of Party

    II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  14. 04-Nov-2023

    Appearance Of Party

    II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  15. 01-Apr-2023

    Appearance Of Party

    II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  16. 03-Dec-2022

    Appearance Of Party

    II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  17. 29-Jul-2022

    Appearance Of Party

    II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  18. 31-Mar-2022

    Appearance Of Party

    II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  19. 11-Jan-2022

    Appearance Of Party

    II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  20. 06-Dec-2021

    Appearance Of Party

    II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  21. 06-Sep-2021

    Appearance Of Party

    II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  22. 31-May-2021

    Notice

    II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  23. 02-Jan-2021

    Notice

    II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  24. 01-Jan-2021

    Notice

    II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  25. 10-Nov-2020

    Notice

    II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  26. 28-Sep-2020

    Notice

    II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  27. 23-Apr-2020

    Notice

    II Addl District and Sessions Judge Bagalkot

  28. 18-Jan-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 04-Jan-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 27/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed the land acquisition compensation reference petitions in part, determining that four agricultural landowners from Chabbi village are entitled to enhanced compensation for their land acquired for the Ghataprabha irrigation project. The court rejected the original award valuations as inadequate and fixed the base land value at Rs. 7,75,000 per gunta (based on comparable sale deed evidence), with claimants entitled to a 2x multiplier, 12% annual additional market value, and 9-15% interest as per the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in LARR Act, 2013. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case