RADHIKA NANDIVADA alias RADHIKA MURTHY vs GEORGE THANGIAH — 3972/2012
Case under Indian Penal Code. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
Com.O.S. - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: KABC170104862020
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
3898/2012
Filing Date
06-06-2012
Registration No
3972/2012
Registration Date
06-06-2012
Court
COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU
Judge
1445-CCH-85 LXXXIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RADHIKA NANDIVADA alias RADHIKA MURTHY
Adv. Monika H.B.
Respondent(s)
GEORGE THANGIAH
Hearing History
Judge: 1445-CCH-85 LXXXIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 25-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 19-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 12-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 04-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected all five interlocutory applications (IA Nos. 10-14) filed by the plaintiff seeking to reopen evidence, recall witness PW1, produce additional documents from a related commercial suit (Com.OS 815/2025), and summon a new witness. The court held that after 14 years of pendency and substantial evidence already led by both parties, allowing these applications would impermissibly reopen the entire trial and violate Commercial Court Act timelines. The matter was posted for defendant's further evidence by 12.02.2026 as the last chance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected all five interlocutory applications (IA Nos. 10-14) filed by the plaintiff seeking to reopen evidence, recall witness PW1, produce additional documents from a related commercial suit (Com.OS 815/2025), and summon a new witness. The court held that after 14 years of pendency and substantial evidence already led by both parties, allowing these applications would impermissibly reopen the entire trial and violate Commercial Court Act timelines. The matter was posted for defendant's further evidence by 12.02.2026 as the last chance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts