RADHIKA NANDIVADA alias RADHIKA MURTHY vs GEORGE THANGIAH — 3972/2012
Case under Indian Penal Code. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
Com.O.S. - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: KABC170104862020
Filing Number
3898/2012
Filing Date
06-Jun-2012
Registration No
3972/2012
Registration Date
06-Jun-2012
Court
COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU
Judge
1445-Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
Last updated 20-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RADHIKA NANDIVADA alias RADHIKA MURTHY
Adv. Monika H.B.
Respondent(s)
-
1.GEORGE THANGIAH
Case History
-
26-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Arguments
Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Arguments
Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Summons
Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Summons
Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary: The court rejected all five interlocutory applications (IA Nos. 10-14) filed by the plaintiff seeking to reopen evidence, recall witness PW1, produce additional documents from a related commercial suit (Com.OS 815/2025), and summon a new witness. The court held that after 14 years of pendency and substantial evidence already led by both parties, allowing these applications would impermissibly reopen the entire trial and violate Commercial Court Act timelines. The matter was posted for defendant's further evidence by 12.02.2026 as the last chance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Orders
Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
30-Jan-2026
Orders
Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Orders
Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
06-Jan-2026
Hearing
Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
15-Dec-2025
Hearing
Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Hearing
Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
18-Nov-2025
Hearing
Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
18-Nov-2025
Restored
Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
18-Nov-2025
Appearance Of Party
Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
08-Apr-2021
JudgmentView PDF
-
08-Apr-2021
Disposed
Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
03-Apr-2021
Hearing
Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
01-Apr-2021
Orders
Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2021
Hearing
Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2021
Summons
Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2021
Summons
Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
23-Feb-2021
Objection
Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
01-Feb-2021
Objection
Cch-85 LXXXIV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
30-Nov-2020
Summons
Cch-83 LXXXII Addl City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
05-Oct-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jun-2012
Case filed
Registration No. 3972/2012
Summary: The court rejected all five interlocutory applications (IA Nos. 10-14) filed by the plaintiff seeking to reopen evidence, recall witness PW1, produce additional documents from a related commercial suit (Com.OS 815/2025), and summon a new witness. The court held that after 14 years of pendency and substantial evidence already led by both parties, allowing these applications would impermissibly reopen the entire trial and violate Commercial Court Act timelines. The matter was posted for defendant's further evidence by 12.02.2026 as the last chance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts