M S VIOM NETWORKS LTD vs BOOPATHI S — 3436/2015
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 and 2 and R/w Sec 26 of Cpc. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
Com.O.S. - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: KABC170095992020
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
3436/2015
Filing Date
10-04-2015
Registration No
3436/2015
Registration Date
10-04-2015
Court
COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU
Judge
1389-CCH-83 LXXXII ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M S VIOM NETWORKS LTD
Adv. PRAKASH B N
Respondent(s)
BOOPATHI S
HARIBABU C
CHANDRA SHEKAR K.M
AMARNAGENDRA REDDY R
MANOJ KUMAR V.R
DIVYANANDA M
KHADAR VALI
SHIRISH KUMAR SINGH
BHAS ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTIONS
KANTALAM KULAI BASHA
MUKKAMALLA HEMANTHA KUMAR REDDY
CHAITHANAYA ELECTRICALS
KMC ENTERPRISES
SAM ENTERPRISES
SAI BABA ENTERPRISES
LOKESH ENTERPRISES
LOKESH M
SHANTHA
PRASHANTH ELECTRICALS
SREE MARUTHI COMMUNICATIONS
GOODWILL ENTERPRISES
ASHA ENTERPRISES
M.V INFRA SERVICES PVT LTD
M.V COMMUNICATION
SIDDARTH ELECTRICALS
VIGNESH ENTERPRISES
SAI ENTERPRISES
Hearing History
Judge: 1389-CCH-83 LXXXII ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 20-01-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 28-11-2025 | SUMMONS |
| 24-09-2025 | SUMMONS |
| 23-07-2025 | SUMMONS |
Interim Orders
Summary: In COM.O.S.No.3436/2015 before the LXXII Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, witness N. Senathipathi (PW-1) filed an affidavit in lieu of oral examination-in-chief on 11.07.2022, confirming its contents and authenticity. The further examination-in-chief was deferred at the request of the plaintiff's advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In COM.O.S.No.3436/2015 before the LXXII Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, witness N. Senathipathi (PW-1) filed an affidavit in lieu of oral examination-in-chief on 11.07.2022, confirming its contents and authenticity. The further examination-in-chief was deferred at the request of the plaintiff's advocate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts