SHAHNAZ BANO vs MANSOOR NAGHNOOR — 7168/2015

Case under U/o Vii Rule 1 of Cpc. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Com.O.S. - Commercial Original Suit

CNR: KABC170083782020

SUMMONS

Next Hearing

05th June 2026

Filing Number

7168/2015

Filing Date

17-08-2015

Registration No

7168/2015

Registration Date

17-08-2015

Court

COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU

Judge

1389-CCH-83 LXXXII ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Acts & Sections

U/o Vii Rule 1 of Cpc

Petitioner(s)

SHAHNAZ BANO

Adv. HUMAYUN M A

Respondent(s)

MANSOOR NAGHNOOR

SYED NAJMUL HASSAN SALEH

Hearing History

Judge: 1389-CCH-83 LXXXII ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

06-03-2026

SUMMONS

20-01-2026

SUMMONS

28-11-2025

SUMMONS

14-10-2025

SUMMONS

14-08-2025

SUMMONS

Interim Orders

25-08-2021
Orders
05-10-2021
Orders

Summary: In this commercial suit between Smt. Shahnaz Bano (plaintiff) and Mr. Mansoor Naghnoor and another (defendants), the court passed orders on October 5, 2021, regarding admissions and denials of documents. The court marked several admitted documents as exhibits, including a Joint Development Agreement dated 08.05.2014, notices, and legal correspondence, while rejecting unjustified blanket denials of documents. The case has been adjourned to October 21, 2021, for hearing arguments under Order XV-A Rule 6(1)(r) of the Civil Procedure Code to determine whether the entire dispute can be resolved without further oral evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In this commercial suit between Smt. Shahnaz Bano (plaintiff) and Mr. Mansoor Naghnoor and another (defendants), the court passed orders on October 5, 2021, regarding admissions and denials of documents. The court marked several admitted documents as exhibits, including a Joint Development Agreement dated 08.05.2014, notices, and legal correspondence, while rejecting unjustified blanket denials of documents. The case has been adjourned to October 21, 2021, for hearing arguments under Order XV-A Rule 6(1)(r) of the Civil Procedure Code to determine whether the entire dispute can be resolved without further oral evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case