MAHADEVA vs M/S ARATTUKULAM DEVELOPERS Advocate - Siddharth Suman — 17/2020

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Com.A.P. - Commercial Arbitration Appeal

CNR: KABC170080552020

Filing Number

17/2020

Filing Date

19-Feb-2020

Registration No

17/2020

Registration Date

19-Feb-2020

Court

COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU

Judge

1477-Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHADEVA

    Adv. RAVINDRANATH B

  2. 2.KAVITHA

  3. 3.SHIRISH GOWDA

  4. 4.CHETHAN GOWDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S ARATTUKULAM DEVELOPERS Advocate - Siddharth Suman

  2. 2.RAGHAVENDRA RAO G

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Summary The Bengaluru Commercial Court dismissed a petition seeking to set aside an arbitral award in a Joint Development Agreement dispute. The court held that the arbitrator properly awarded Rs. 1,28,925/- monthly compensation for 45% project deficiency during July 2017 to May 2019, finding the developer liable for delays since the 15-month completion period should be calculated from plan sanction (February 2016), not the agreement date, and governmental delays do not excuse the developer's performance obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Judgments

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Judgments

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  8. 05-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  9. 31-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  10. 24-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  11. 17-Jan-2026

    Objection

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  12. 12-Jan-2026

    Objection

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  13. 09-Dec-2025

    Summons

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  14. 17-Nov-2025

    Notice

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  15. 03-Nov-2025

    Summons

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  16. 13-Oct-2025

    Notice

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  17. 25-Sep-2025

    Summons

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  18. 18-Sep-2025

    Summons

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  19. 29-Aug-2025

    Summons

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  20. 14-Aug-2025

    Notice

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  21. 07-Aug-2025

    Notice

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  22. 31-Jul-2025

    Notice

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  23. 03-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  24. 03-Jul-2025

    Restored

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  25. 03-Jul-2025

    Summons

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  26. 04-Apr-2022

    Judgment

  27. 04-Apr-2022

    Disposed

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  28. 21-Mar-2022

    Judgments

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  29. 28-Feb-2022

    Arguments

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  30. 17-Feb-2022

    A.D.R.

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  31. 09-Feb-2022

    Arguments

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  32. 28-Jan-2022

    Arguments

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  33. 24-Jan-2022

    Arguments

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  34. 18-Jan-2022

    Arguments

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  35. 11-Jan-2022

    Arguments

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  36. 20-Dec-2021

    Arguments

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  37. 06-Dec-2021

    Arguments

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  38. 06-Nov-2021

    Summons

    Cch-83 LXXXII Addl City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  39. 04-Nov-2021

    Summons

    Cch-83 LXXXII Addl City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  40. 27-Sep-2021

    Summons

    Cch-83 LXXXII Addl City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  41. 27-Aug-2021

    Summons

    Cch-83 LXXXII Addl City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  42. 29-Jul-2021

    Summons

    Cch-83 LXXXII Addl City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  43. 31-May-2021

    Summons

    Cch-83 LXXXII Addl City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  44. 29-May-2021

    Summons

    Cch-83 LXXXII Addl City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  45. 16-Apr-2021

    Summons

    Cch-83 LXXXII Addl City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  46. 10-Mar-2021

    Summons

    Cch-83 LXXXII Addl City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  47. 19-Jan-2021

    Notice

    Cch-83 LXXXII Addl City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  48. 14-Dec-2020

    Notice

    Cch-83 LXXXII Addl City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  49. 13-Nov-2020

    Notice

    Cch-83 LXXXII Addl City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  50. 12-Oct-2020

    Notice

    Cch-83 LXXXII Addl City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  51. 18-Sep-2020

    Notice

    Cch-83 LXXXII Addl City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  52. 26-Aug-2020

    Notice

    Cch-83 LXXXII Addl City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  53. 31-Jul-2020

    Notice

    Cch-83 LXXXII Addl City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  54. 19-Feb-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  55. 19-Feb-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 17/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bengaluru Commercial Court dismissed a petition seeking to set aside an arbitral award in a Joint Development Agreement dispute. The court held that the arbitrator properly awarded Rs. 1,28,925/- monthly compensation for 45% project deficiency during July 2017 to May 2019, finding the developer liable for delays since the 15-month completion period should be calculated from plan sanction (February 2016), not the agreement date, and governmental delays do not excuse the developer's performance obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case