KSQURE PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED vs V R RAGHURAMA BHATTAR — 1691/2025

Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 and 2 and R/w Sec 26 of Cpc. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 08-Jul-2026

Com.O.S. - Commercial Original Suit

CNR: KABC170038072025

Filing Number

1691/2025

Filing Date

05-Dec-2025

Registration No

1691/2025

Registration Date

05-Dec-2025

Court

COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU

Judge

1477-Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o 7 Rule 1 and 2 and R/w Sec 26 of Cpc

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KSQURE PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED

    Adv. Aditya Bhat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.V R RAGHURAMA BHATTAR

  2. 2.SREELAKSHMI A

  3. 3.V R RAMYASHREE

  4. 4.SANKARSHANA VINAY V R

  5. 5.V R MUKUNDA

  6. 6.R S USHARANI

  7. 7.VISHNU RAGHAVA

  8. 8.KOUSHAL V M

  9. 9.V R SUDARSHANA

  10. 10.VISHISTA RAGHAVA

  11. 11.RUKMINIBHAVANA

  12. 12.SOWMYALAKSHMI M

Case History

  1. 08-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jul-2026

    Evidence

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  3. 22-Jun-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: COM OS 1691/2025 K Square Properties Pvt Ltd v. V R Raghurama Bhattar & Others (Commercial Court, Bangalore) The plaintiff filed an affidavit-based suit concerning a joint development agreement for residential project "Ksquare Araki" on property owned by defendants. Plaintiff claimed defendants unlawfully attempted to sell/encumber the property and terminate the JDA despite plaintiff's substantial investments (₹2.45 crores paid to defendants), completed preparatory works, and defendants' acknowledgment of received funds via addendum dated 03.03.2025. Plaintiff seeks temporary injunction restraining defendants from alienating the property. Case adjourned for further examination on 22.06.2026; plaintiff's affidavit accepted and supporting documents filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 22-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  5. 17-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  6. 03-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  7. 23-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  8. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  9. 06-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

  10. 06-Apr-2026

    Summons

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  11. 24-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  12. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  13. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  14. 05-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  15. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  16. 19-Feb-2026

    Objection

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  17. 05-Feb-2026

    Summons

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  18. 27-Jan-2026

    Summons

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  19. 09-Jan-2026

    Summons

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  20. 17-Dec-2025

    OrdersView PDF

  21. 17-Dec-2025

    Summons

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  22. 15-Dec-2025

    Orders

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  23. 09-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Cch-86 LXXXV Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  24. 06-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 05-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1691/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: COM OS 1691/2025 K Square Properties Pvt Ltd v. V R Raghurama Bhattar & Others (Commercial Court, Bangalore) The plaintiff filed an affidavit-based suit concerning a joint development agreement for residential project "Ksquare Araki" on property owned by defendants. Plaintiff claimed defendants unlawfully attempted to sell/encumber the property and terminate the JDA despite plaintiff's substantial investments (₹2.45 crores paid to defendants), completed preparatory works, and defendants' acknowledgment of received funds via addendum dated 03.03.2025. Plaintiff seeks temporary injunction restraining defendants from alienating the property. Case adjourned for further examination on 22.06.2026; plaintiff's affidavit accepted and supporting documents filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case