BANK OF BARODA vs SHIVARAJU K S — 1610/2025

Case under U/o Vii Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Com.O.S. - Commercial Original Suit

CNR: KABC170036102025

e-Filing Number

18-11-2025

Filing Number

1610/2025

Filing Date

19-Nov-2025

Registration No

1610/2025

Registration Date

19-Nov-2025

Court

COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU

Judge

1478-Cch-87 LXXXVI Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED EX-PARTE

Last updated 20-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o Vii Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BANK OF BARODA

    Adv. K Prakash

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHIVARAJU K S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    The Bengaluru Commercial Court decreed Bank of Baroda's suit against Shivaraju K.S., ordering him to pay Rs. 8,70,909 plus interest at 10.95% p.a. from June 17, 2025, for defaulting on a Rs. 24 lakh CGTMSE term loan sanctioned in November 2020. The court found the bank's documentary evidence credible and the defendant's exparte status (non-appearance) did not challenge the claim, authorizing the bank to sell hypothecated machinery toward recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Cch-87 LXXXVI Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Judgments

    Cch-87 LXXXVI Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Judgments

    Cch-87 LXXXVI Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Cch-87 LXXXVI Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge

  8. 20-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 19-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1610/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bengaluru Commercial Court decreed Bank of Baroda's suit against Shivaraju K.S., ordering him to pay Rs. 8,70,909 plus interest at 10.95% p.a. from June 17, 2025, for defaulting on a Rs. 24 lakh CGTMSE term loan sanctioned in November 2020. The court found the bank's documentary evidence credible and the defendant's exparte status (non-appearance) did not challenge the claim, authorizing the bank to sell hypothecated machinery toward recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case