K S NANDAGOPAL vs K V RANJITH KUMAR Advocate - D.PRABHAKAR — 1713/2024
Case under U/s 26 and Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc. Status: NULL. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Com.O.S. - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: KABC170034442024
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
1712/2024
Filing Date
17-12-2024
Registration No
1713/2024
Registration Date
18-12-2024
Court
COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU
Judge
1477-CCH-86 LXXXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K S NANDAGOPAL
Adv. G.V.SUDHAKAR
Respondent(s)
K V RANJITH KUMAR Advocate - D.PRABHAKAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1477-CCH-86 LXXXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
NULL
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
A.D.R.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | NULL |
| 09-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 02-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 24-02-2026 | A.D.R. |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a cross-examination proceeding (dated 10.02.2026) in Commercial Suit Com.O.S.1713/2024 before the LXXXV Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru. The defendant witness (DW.1) testified regarding a rental dispute involving V.R. Constructions, where the plaintiff claims Rs.55,85,424/- plus 18% interest for unpaid GST that the defendant allegedly failed to remit to the department from April 2020 to October 2022. The witness denied liability and maintained that GST was paid based on vouchers provided by the plaintiff, though he could not specify which months or produce complete documentation of GST portal uploads and payment receipts. No final order was pronounced; this proceeding records only the witness examination stage of the ongoing case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a cross-examination proceeding (dated 10.02.2026) in Commercial Suit Com.O.S.1713/2024 before the LXXXV Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru. The defendant witness (DW.1) testified regarding a rental dispute involving V.R. Constructions, where the plaintiff claims Rs.55,85,424/- plus 18% interest for unpaid GST that the defendant allegedly failed to remit to the department from April 2020 to October 2022. The witness denied liability and maintained that GST was paid based on vouchers provided by the plaintiff, though he could not specify which months or produce complete documentation of GST portal uploads and payment receipts. No final order was pronounced; this proceeding records only the witness examination stage of the ongoing case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts