PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK vs MANOHARA L H Advocate - B.N. Yogendra — 1458/2025
Case under U/s 26 and Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
Com.O.S. - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: KABC170032902025
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
e-Filing Number
16-10-2025
Filing Number
1454/2025
Filing Date
17-10-2025
Registration No
1458/2025
Registration Date
18-10-2025
Court
COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU
Judge
1445-CCH-85 LXXXIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
Adv. RAMESH KUMAR.K
Respondent(s)
MANOHARA L H Advocate - B.N. Yogendra
Hearing History
Judge: 1445-CCH-85 LXXXIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 23-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-02-2026 | ORDERS |
Interim Orders
This document records the cross-examination of a defendant witness (DW1) in Commercial Case No. 1458/2025 before the Commercial Court in Bengaluru on 06.03.2026. The witness, a BSNL employee, testified regarding his deceased wife Sopna H.'s bank accounts and business (Tirumala Telecom), with various documents admitted as evidence including emails, death certificate, and account statements. The witness denied allegations that he conducted unauthorized transactions after his wife's death or that he is personally liable for business debts, though he acknowledged needing to verify certain records regarding his wife's brother's involvement in the business operations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records the cross-examination of a defendant witness (DW1) in Commercial Case No. 1458/2025 before the Commercial Court in Bengaluru on 06.03.2026. The witness, a BSNL employee, testified regarding his deceased wife Sopna H.'s bank accounts and business (Tirumala Telecom), with various documents admitted as evidence including emails, death certificate, and account statements. The witness denied allegations that he conducted unauthorized transactions after his wife's death or that he is personally liable for business debts, though he acknowledged needing to verify certain records regarding his wife's brother's involvement in the business operations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts