PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK vs MANOHARA L H Advocate - B.N. Yogendra — 1458/2025

Case under U/s 26 and Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.

Com.O.S. - Commercial Original Suit

CNR: KABC170032902025

ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

24th March 2026

e-Filing Number

16-10-2025

Filing Number

1454/2025

Filing Date

17-10-2025

Registration No

1458/2025

Registration Date

18-10-2025

Court

COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU

Judge

1445-CCH-85 LXXXIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

Acts & Sections

U/s 26 and Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc

Petitioner(s)

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

Adv. RAMESH KUMAR.K

Respondent(s)

MANOHARA L H Advocate - B.N. Yogendra

Hearing History

Judge: 1445-CCH-85 LXXXIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE

16-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

06-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

23-02-2026

EVIDENCE

20-02-2026

EVIDENCE

17-02-2026

ORDERS

Interim Orders

09-01-2026
Issue
21-01-2026
Deposition
27-01-2026
Deposition
02-02-2026
Deposition
20-02-2026
Orders
23-02-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition

This document records the cross-examination of a defendant witness (DW1) in Commercial Case No. 1458/2025 before the Commercial Court in Bengaluru on 06.03.2026. The witness, a BSNL employee, testified regarding his deceased wife Sopna H.'s bank accounts and business (Tirumala Telecom), with various documents admitted as evidence including emails, death certificate, and account statements. The witness denied allegations that he conducted unauthorized transactions after his wife's death or that he is personally liable for business debts, though he acknowledged needing to verify certain records regarding his wife's brother's involvement in the business operations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document records the cross-examination of a defendant witness (DW1) in Commercial Case No. 1458/2025 before the Commercial Court in Bengaluru on 06.03.2026. The witness, a BSNL employee, testified regarding his deceased wife Sopna H.'s bank accounts and business (Tirumala Telecom), with various documents admitted as evidence including emails, death certificate, and account statements. The witness denied allegations that he conducted unauthorized transactions after his wife's death or that he is personally liable for business debts, though he acknowledged needing to verify certain records regarding his wife's brother's involvement in the business operations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case