Volvo Financial Services Private Limited vs S S Constructions Advocate - Vikhar Ahmed B — 368/2025
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section sec.9. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
Com.A.A. - Commerical Arbitration Application
CNR: KABC170027912025
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
e-Filing Number
02-09-2025
Filing Number
368/2025
Filing Date
03-09-2025
Registration No
368/2025
Registration Date
03-09-2025
Court
COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU
Judge
1445-CCH-85 LXXXIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Volvo Financial Services Private Limited
Adv. Harisha T
Respondent(s)
S S Constructions Advocate - Vikhar Ahmed B
Althuru Sahini Reddy
Hearing History
Judge: 1445-CCH-85 LXXXIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 21-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 11-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 29-01-2026 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Com.AA.No.368/2025 | Bengaluru Commercial Court | October 24, 2025 Outcome: Application allowed in part. The court found that Volvo Financial Services suppressed material facts (pending arbitration challenge and stay order in Gurugram) when obtaining an ex-parte receiver appointment order, and directed the company to return seized construction equipment to respondents within 15 days at its own cost, plus pay ₹50,000 in application costs and ₹10,000/day penalty for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Com.AA.No.368/2025 | Bengaluru Commercial Court | October 24, 2025 Outcome: Application allowed in part. The court found that Volvo Financial Services suppressed material facts (pending arbitration challenge and stay order in Gurugram) when obtaining an ex-parte receiver appointment order, and directed the company to return seized construction equipment to respondents within 15 days at its own cost, plus pay ₹50,000 in application costs and ₹10,000/day penalty for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts