Rooman Technologies Private Limited vs Karnataka State Rural Livelihood Promotion Society Advocate - M.CHAMARAJ — 359/2025
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section Section9. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
Com.A.A. - Commerical Arbitration Application
CNR: KABC170027052025
e-Filing Number
23-08-2025
Filing Number
359/2025
Filing Date
23-Aug-2025
Registration No
359/2025
Registration Date
23-Aug-2025
Court
COMMERCIAL COURT,BENGALURU
Judge
1478-Cch-87 LXXXVI Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
Last updated 20-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rooman Technologies Private Limited
Adv. Ravi Raghavan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Karnataka State Rural Livelihood Promotion Society Advocate - M.CHAMARAJ
Case History
-
11-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Cch-87 LXXXVI Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Hearing
Cch-87 LXXXVI Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Hearing
Cch-87 LXXXVI Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Hearing
Cch-87 LXXXVI Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
11-Nov-2025
Hearing
Cch-87 LXXXVI Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
09-Oct-2025
Hearing
Cch-87 LXXXVI Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
15-Sep-2025
Objection
Cch-87 LXXXVI Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
28-Aug-2025
OrdersView PDF
Summary: The court granted an interim restraining order preventing the respondent (nodal agency for DDUGKY) from invoking a bank guarantee of Rs.91,39,606/- deposited by the applicant under their training contract. The applicant alleged the respondent failed to release the first installment of Rs.3,53,65,047/- and threatened to invoke the guarantee, prompting this protective order pending arbitration. The case is returnable by 15.09.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Aug-2025
Notice
Cch-87 LXXXVI Addl. City CIVIL And Sessions Judge
-
23-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 359/2025
Summary: The court granted an interim restraining order preventing the respondent (nodal agency for DDUGKY) from invoking a bank guarantee of Rs.91,39,606/- deposited by the applicant under their training contract. The applicant alleged the respondent failed to release the first installment of Rs.3,53,65,047/- and threatened to invoke the guarantee, prompting this protective order pending arbitration. The case is returnable by 15.09.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts